Elon Musk joins the Joe Rogan Experience to discuss current affairs, including space exploration with Starship, the fight against government waste through DOGE, and the future of AI. He shares insights on his vision for autonomous transport, the risks of AI ideology, and the simulation theory.
Elon Musk joins the Joe Rogan Experience to discuss current affairs, including space exploration with Starship, the fight against government waste through DOGE, and the future of AI. He shares insights on his vision for autonomous transport, the risks of AI ideology, and the simulation theory.
Published October 31, 2025
Upload your interview recording and get professional transcription with AI-generated insights.
Upload Your InterviewElon Musk
Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, Artificial Intelligence, SpaceX, Starship, Technology, Future, Economics, Robotics, Grok
Joe Rogan podcast, check it out.
The Joe Rogan experience.
Train by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day.
Exactly.
Just every morning.
What are what Jeff Bezos is doing?
Definitely doing some testosterone.
He looks jacked.
He looks jacked, right?
Yeah, but he's like...
Quick.
Quick.
Quick.
He got jacked quick.
At age 59 in less than a year,
he went from pencil net geek to looking like The Rock.
Yeah, like a little miniature alpha fella.
Yeah, like his neck got bigger than his head.
Yeah, he got big quick.
But then his earlier pictures, his neck's like a noodle.
I support this activity.
I want to see him going in this direction.
Which is fine, and his voice dropped like two octaves.
I want you to move in that direction as well.
I think we can achieve this.
I mean, I should.
I think we can achieve Giga Chad.
That's what Beeple called it.
Where is that guy?
Beeple?
I don't know where he is.
That's like a real guy.
The artist?
Yeah.
Oh, Giga Chad.
Oh, Giga Chad.
Yeah, I don't know if that's a real guy.
It's hard to tell.
No, no, it is a real guy.
It is a real guy?
Yeah.
He's got the crazy jaw and perfect sculpted hair.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, they may have exaggerated a little bit, but...
Probably.
But, no, I think he actually just kind of looked like that in reality.
Wow.
So, like he's a pretty unique looking individual.
I think we can achieve this.
That guy right there?
Yeah, that's a real guy.
That's a real dude.
I always thought that was CGI.
No, I think the upper right one is not him.
That's not him.
That one to the left of that?
Like, that's real?
No, that's artificial, bro.
That's fake.
That's got that uncanny valley feel to it.
Doesn't it?
It's not impossible.
No.
No, it's not possible to achieve, but it's not possible to maintain that kind of leanness.
No, no.
That's a crazy leanness.
That's like, you're also, at that point, he's dehydrating and all sorts of things.
Oh, it's based on a real person.
Yeah, yeah.
Based on a real person.
Right, but it's not a real person.
What does he really look like?
Those images, I think, are bullshit.
Some of them are.
Is that real?
Okay, that looks real.
That looks like a really jack bodybuilder.
Yeah.
Yeah, that looks real.
Like, that's achievable, but there's a few of those images where you're just like, what's going on here?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Totally.
Well, I mean, you see it?
Is that the...
That's the real dude.
Well, there's that Icelandic dude who's Thor.
Oh, yeah.
The guy who jumps into the frozen lakes and shit.
Well, the guy who played the mountain.
Oh, that guy.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
That is like a mutant strong human.
Yes.
Yeah.
Like, he would be in like the X-Men or something, you know?
We were hanging out.
I mean, he's just like not like a...
And there's that...
You know that...
I've seen that meme, tent and tent bag?
No.
You know how like it's like, it's really hard to get the tent and tent in the tent?
Oh, right, right.
That's true.
And there's a picture of him and his girlfriend.
Oh, right.
Tent bag.
That's hilarious.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's his wife.
I don't know how it gets in there, you know?
It's like, it seems too small, but...
I met Brian Shaw.
Brian Shaw is like the world's most powerful man.
And he's almost seven feet tall.
He's 400 pounds.
And his bone density is one in 500 million people.
So there's one...
Wow.
It's like there's like maybe 16 people.
Really dense bones?
He's an enormous human being.
Okay.
Like a legitimate giant.
Just like that guy.
Yeah, yeah.
But we met him.
He was hanging out with us in the green room of the mothership.
But it's like, okay, if this was like David and Goliath days, like this is an actual giant.
Like the giants of the Bible.
Once in a while, they get a super giant person.
This is a real one.
Like not a tall, skinny basketball player.
Yeah, yeah.
Like a seven foot, 400 pound power lifter.
Like you don't want to...
Especially...
Look at him.
That's the guy.
See if there's a photo of him standing next to like a regular human.
There it is.
Yeah.
That's him right there.
Like there's like one of him next to standing next to Arnold and stuff.
Yeah.
And it's where...
And Arnold...
Everyone just looks tiny.
I mean, I think he's a pretty cool dude actually.
Oh, Brian's very cool.
Very smart too.
Yeah, yeah.
Unusually.
You know, you expect anybody to be that big.
It's got to be a moron.
Yeah.
No.
Yeah.
There's Andre the Giant who was awesome.
Yeah.
He was great in Princess Bride.
No, he was just awesome period.
Yeah, yeah.
So we were talking about this interview with Sam Altman and Tucker.
And I was like, we should probably just talk about this on the air.
Because it is one of the craziest interviews I think I've ever seen in my life.
Yeah.
Where Tucker starts bringing up this guy who was...
Yeah, a whistleblower or whatever.
A whistleblower who, you know, committed suicide but doesn't look like it.
And he's talking to Sam Altman about this.
And Sam Altman's like, are you accusing me?
He's like, no, no, no.
I'm not.
I'm just saying.
I think someone killed him.
Yeah.
And should be investigated.
Yeah.
Not just drop the case.
It seems like...
They just dropped the case.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
It seems like...
But his parents think he was murdered.
Yeah.
The wires to a security camera were cut.
Blood in two rooms.
Blood in two rooms.
Someone else's wig was in the room.
Someone else's wig.
Wig.
Wig.
Yes.
Not normal.
Not his wig.
Not normal to have a wig laying around.
Yes.
And he ordered DoorDash right before allegedly committing suicide.
Yeah.
Which seems unusual.
You know?
Yeah.
It's like, you know, I'm going to order pizza on Second Thoughts.
I'll kill myself.
It seems like that's a very rapid change in mindset.
It's very weird.
And especially the parents have...
They don't believe he committed suicide at all.
Has no note or anything.
No.
Yeah.
It seems pretty fucked up.
And, you know, the idea that a whistleblower for an enormous AI company that's worth billions of dollars might get whacked, that's not outside the pale.
I mean, it's straight out of a movie.
Right out of a movie.
But right out of a movie is real sometimes.
Yeah, right.
Exactly.
It's like, it's a little weird that I think they should do a proper investigation.
Like, what's the downside on that proper investigation?
Right.
No.
Yeah.
For sure.
Yeah, yeah.
But the whole exchange is so bizarre.
Yeah, yeah.
It is.
Sam Altman's reaction to being accused of murder is bizarre.
Look, I don't know if he's guilty, but it's not possible to look more guilty.
So I'm like...
Or look more weird.
Yeah.
You know, maybe it's just his social thing.
Like, maybe he's just odd with confrontation and it just goes blank.
You know?
But if somebody was accusing me of killing Jamie, like if Jamie was a whistleblower and Jamie got whacked, and then I'd be like, wait, what are you...
What are you...
Are you accusing me of killing my friend?
Like, what the fuck are you talking about?
I would be a little bit more irate.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
You know, it'd be...
I would be a little upset.
Yeah, it'd be like...
Well, you'd certainly insist on a thorough investigation.
Yeah.
As opposed to trying to sweep it under the rug.
Yeah, I wouldn't assume that he committed suicide.
I would be suspicious.
If Tucker was telling me that aspect of the story, I'd be like, that does seem like a murder.
Fuck.
We should look into this.
I mean, all signs point to it being a murder.
Not saying, you know, Sam Altman had anything to do with the murder, but...
Blood in two rooms.
But blood in two rooms.
Like, yeah.
There's...
Look, it could be...
The wire is the security camera and the door dash being ordered right before suicide.
No suicide note.
His parents think he was murdered.
And the people that I know who knew him said he was not suicidal.
So I'm like, why would you jump to the conclusion?
My parents just sued the landlord.
Uh...
Landlord?
They sued the son's landlord.
Alleged the owners and the managers of their son's San Francisco apartment building were part of a widespread cover-up of his death.
The landlord?
Yeah, there's a bunch of weird...
They said there was, like, packages missing from the building.
Some people said they saw packages still being delivered, and then all of a sudden they all disappeared.
Huh.
A few different reasons.
But that could be...
People steal people's packages all the time.
The porch pirate situation.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It says they failed to safeguard...
Also, I mean, the amount of trauma those poor parents have gone through with their son dying like that.
I mean, it must...
God bless them.
And how could they stay sane after something like that?
They're probably...
They're so grief-stricken.
Who knows what they believe at this point?
Yeah.
He should have asked if Epson killed himself.
Yeah.
That's the Cash Patel thing with Cash Patel and Dan Bongino when they were trying to convince everybody of that.
Like, okay.
The guards weren't there, and the camera stopped working, and, you know...
The guards were asleep.
The cameras weren't working.
He had a giant steroided-up bodybuilder guy that he was sharing a cell with that was a murderer who was a bad cop.
Like, all of it's kind of nuts.
Yeah.
All of it's kind of nuts.
Like, that he would just kill himself rather than reveal all of his billionaire friends.
Yeah.
And then...
Did you see Tim Dillon talking to Chris Cuomo about this?
I did.
Chris Cuomo just looked so stupid.
Tim just listed off all the...
Tim just...
And he's like, I agree.
It is strange.
Like, of course it's strange, Chris.
Jesus Christ.
You can't just go with the tide.
You got to think things through.
And if you think that one through, you're like, I don't think he killed himself.
Nobody does.
You don't have to work for an intelligence agency to think he killed himself.
It does seem unlikely.
It seems highly unlikely.
Highly, highly unlikely.
All roads point to murder.
Yes.
Point to they had to get rid of him because he knew too much.
Whatever the fuck he was doing, whatever kind of an asset he was, whatever thing he was up to, you know, was apparently very effective.
Yes.
And a lot of people were compromised.
You see, your boy Bill Gates is now saying climate change is not a big deal.
Like, relax, everybody.
I know I scared the fuck out of you for the last decade and a half, but, eh, we're going to be fine.
I mean, you know, as I was saying just before coming into the studio, you know, like every day there's some crazy, wild new thing that's happening.
It feels like reality is accelerating.
It's every day.
And every day it's like more and more ridiculous to the point where the simulation is more and more undeniable.
Yeah, yeah.
It really feels like simulation.
You know, it's like, come on.
What are the odds that this could be the case?
Are you paying attention at all to 3i Atlas?
Are you watching that?
Oh, there's the comet?
Yeah.
Whatever it is.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, one thing I can say is like, look, if I was aware of any evidence of aliens, Joe, you have my word, I will come on your show and I will reveal it on the show.
Okay.
Yeah.
That's a good deal.
Yeah, it's a pretty good deal.
I believe you.
Yeah, thank you.
Appreciate that.
I'll stick to it.
I keep my promises.
All right.
I'll hold you to that.
Yeah.
Yeah, I don't.
And I'm never committing suicide, to be clear.
I don't think you would either.
Also, on camera, guys, I am never committing suicide, ever.
If someone says you committed suicide, I will fight tooth and nail.
Thank you.
I will fight tooth and nail.
I will not believe it.
I will not believe it.
But the thing about the three-eye atlas is, it's weird.
That's a hell of a name, actually.
Yeah.
It's a third interstellar.
It sounds like third eye or something.
Yeah, it does.
Three eye is a third.
It's only the third interstellar object that's detected.
Okay.
Yeah.
Avi Loeb.
Yeah.
I have to do it all.
I have to do it.
Yeah.
Avi Loeb was on the podcast a couple days ago talking about it.
Yeah.
It could be on this.
I don't know.
But I- Apparently, today, they're saying that it's changed course.
Did you see that, Jamie?
No.
Avi Loeb said something today.
I'll send it to you.
I know it's on Reddit.
Here you go, Jamie.
I'll send it to you right now.
It's fascinating.
It's fascinating also because it's made almost entirely of nickel, whatever it is.
Yeah.
And the only way that exists here is industrial alloys, apparently.
No, there are definitely comets and asteroids that are made primarily of nickel.
Oh, really?
Yeah.
So, the places where you mine nickel on Earth is actually where there was an asteroid, a comet that hit Earth that was a nickel-rich, you know, aspect.
Wow.
Nickel-rich meteorite.
Nickel-rich deposit?
Yeah.
It's coming.
Those are from impacts.
You definitely didn't want to be there at the time because anything would have been obliterated.
Right.
But that's where the sources of nickel and cobalt are these days.
So, this is Avi Loeb.
A few hours ago, the first hint of non-gravitational acceleration that something other than gravity is affecting its acceleration, meaning something is affecting its trajectory beyond gravity was indicated.
Interesting.
Dun-dun-dun.
So, it's mostly nickel, very little iron, which he was saying is, on Earth, it only exists in alloys.
But whatever, you know, you're dealing with another planet.
There are cases where there's very nickel-rich asteroids, meteorites, that have it hit Earth.
And that's what it means for something from space.
Yeah.
Yeah, it doesn't mean it's...
It'll be a very sort of heavy spaceship to make it all out of nickel.
Oh, yeah.
And fucking huge.
The size of Manhattan and all nickel, that's kind of nuts.
Yeah.
That's a heavy spaceship.
That's a real problem if it hits.
Yes.
No, it would, like, obliterate a continent type of thing.
Yeah.
Maybe worse.
It'll probably kill most of human life.
If not all of us.
It depends on what the total mass is, but there's...
I mean, the thing is, like, in the fossil record, there are, you know, there's, like, arguably five major extinction events, like the biggest one of which is the Permian extinction, where almost all life was eliminated.
That actually occurred over several million years.
There's the Jurassic.
I think Jurassic is...
I think that one's pretty definitively an asteroid.
Um, and, um, but there's been five major extinction events, but, um, but what they don't count are really the ones that merely take out a continent.
So the...
Merely?
Yeah, because those don't really show up on the fossil record, you know?
Right.
Um, so unless it's enough to cause a, you know, mass extinction event throughout Earth, it doesn't show up on, you know, in a fossil record that's, uh, 200 million years old.
Um, so the, uh, yeah.
But there have been many, um, many impacts that would have sort of destroyed all life on, you know, let's say half of North America or something like that.
There have been many such impacts through the course of history.
Yeah.
And there's nothing we can do about it right now.
Yeah.
There was one that, um, hits, there was a one that hit Siberia and destroyed, I think, um, a few hundred square miles.
Oh, that's the Tunguska.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's the one from the 1920s, right?
Yeah.
Yeah.
That's the one that coincides with that meteor, that, uh, comets storm that we go through every June and every November that they think is responsible for that Younger Dryas impact.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All that shit's crazy.
Um, thank you, before we go any further, for letting us have a tour of SpaceX.
You're welcome.
And letting us be there for the rocket launch.
Sure.
One of the absolute coolest things I've ever seen in my life.
And we, we, we were, we thought it was only like, I thought it was a half a mile.
Jamie's like it was a mile away.
Turned out it's almost two miles away.
Yeah, yeah.
And you feel it in your chest.
Yeah.
It's very intense.
You have to wear earplugs and you feel it in your chest and it's two miles away.
Yeah.
It was fucking amazing.
Yeah.
And then to go with you up into the command center and to watch all the Starlink satellites with all the different cameras and all in real time as it made its way all the way to Australia, how many minutes?
Like 35, 40 minutes?
Yeah.
Wild.
Watch it touchdown in Australia.
Yeah.
Fucking crazy.
It was amazing.
Yeah, yeah.
Absolutely amazing.
The Starship's awesome.
And anyone can go watch the launch actually.
So you can just go to South Padre Island and get as great view of the launch.
So it's like where a lot of spring breakers go.
So, but we'll be flying pretty frequently out of Starbase in South Texas and we formally incorporated it as a city.
So it's actually a legally, an actual legal city, Starbase, Texas.
It's not that often you hear like, hey, we made a city, you know?
That used to be like, like in the old days, like a startup would be, you go and gather a bunch of people and say, hey, let's go make a town.
Literally.
Right.
That was like, that would have been startups in the old days.
Or a country.
Yeah, or a country.
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah, actually.
If you tried doing that today, there'd be a real problem.
Yeah.
Like maybe something like- There's so much set in stone on the country front these days.
You might be able to pull it off.
You might be able to pull it off.
If you've got a solid island, you might be able to pull it off.
You know?
Probably.
You know, like, Larry Ellison owns Lanai.
Yeah, you could probably-
Is this it right here?
If you put enough effort into it, you could make a new country.
This is one of the different ones.
This is one of the ones that you catch.
Right?
Or is that one- Yeah, that's the booster.
So that's the super heavy booster.
So that's one with- The booster's got 33 engines.
That, and it's, you know, by version four, that will have about 10,000 tons of thrust.
You know, right now, it's about 7,000, 8,000 tons of thrust.
But that's the largest flying object ever made.
I had to explain to someone.
They were going, why do they blow up all the time if you're so smart?
Because there was this fucking idiot on television.
Some guy was being interviewed, and they were talking about you.
And he goes, oh, I think he's a fuckwit.
And he goes, he's a fuckwit.
And he goes, why do you say he's a fuckwit?
Oh, his rockets keep blowing up.
And someone said, yeah, well, why do his rockets blow up?
And I had to explain.
Yeah.
Because it's the only way you find out what the tolerances are.
You have to-
You have to explore the corners of the box.
So when you do a new rocket development program, you have to do what's called exploring the limits, the corners of the box, where you say it's like worst case this, worst case that, to figure out where the limits are.
So you blow up.
Admittedly, in the development process.
It sometimes blows up accidentally.
But we intentionally subject it to a flight regime that is much worse than what we expect in normal flight, so that when we put people on board or valuable cargo, it doesn't blow up.
So, for example, for the flight that you saw, we actually deliberately took heat shield tiles off of Starship in some of the worst locations to say, okay, if we lose a heat shield tile here, is it catastrophic or is it not?
And nonetheless, Starship was able to do a soft landing in the Indian Ocean just west of Australia.
And it got there from Texas in, like, I don't know, 35, 40 minutes type of thing.
So it landed even though you put it through this situation where it has compromised shield.
It had an unusually – we brought it in hot, like an extra hot trajectory with missing tiles to see if it would still make it to a soft landing, which it did.
Now, I should point out, it did have – there were some holes that were burnt into it.
But it was robust enough to land despite having some holes burnt into it, you know, that – yeah.
Because it's coming in like a blazing meteor.
You can see the real-time video.
Well, tell me the speed again because the speed was bananas.
You were talking about –
Yeah, it's like 17,000 miles an hour.
Which is – I'll call it like 25 times the speed of sound or thereabouts.
So the – so think about it like it's like 12 times faster than a bullet from an assault rifle.
You know, a bullet from an assault rifle is around Mach 2.
And it's huge.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Or if you compare it to like a bullet from a, you know, a.45 or 9mm, which is subsonic, that's – you know, it'll be about 30 times faster than a bullet from a handgun.
30 times faster than a bullet from a handgun and it's the size of a skyscraper.
Yes.
Yeah.
That's fast.
It's so wild.
It's so wild to see, man.
It's so exciting.
The factory is so exciting too because like genuinely, no bullshit, I felt like I was witnessing history.
I felt like it was a scene in a movie where someone had expectations and they go, what are they doing?
They're building rockets and you go there.
And as we were walking through, Jamie, you can speak to this too.
Didn't you have the feeling where you're like, oh, this is way bigger than I thought it was.
This is huge.
It's awesome.
It's gigantic.
Fucking crazy.
That's what she said.
The amount of rockets you're making.
I mean, I don't know if you could- Tent back.
Giga Chad in the house.
This is way bigger than I thought it was.
It's a giant metal dick.
You're fucking the universe with your giant metal dick.
That's what it is.
I mean, yeah, it is very big.
And the sheer numbers of them that you guys are making.
And then this is a version and you have a new updated version that's coming soon.
And what is the difference?
It's a little longer.
More pointy?
It's the same amount of pointy.
But it's got a bit more length.
The interstage, you see that interstage section with kind of like the grill area?
Mm-hmm.
That's now integrated with the boost stage.
So we do what's called hot staging.
Where we light the ship engines while it's still attached to the booster.
So the booster engines are still thrusting.
It's still being pushed forward by the booster of the ship.
But then we light the ship engines.
And the ship engines actually pull away from the booster.
Even though the booster engines are still firing.
Whoa.
So it's blasting flame through that grill section.
But we integrate that grill section into the boost stage with the next version of the rocket.
And the next version of the rocket will have the Raptor 3 engines, which are a huge improvement.
You may have seen them in the lobby.
Yeah.
Because we've got like the Raptor 1, 2, and 3.
And you can see the dramatic improvement in simplicity.
We should probably put a plaque there to also show how much we reduce the weight, the cost, and improve the efficiency and the thrust.
So the Raptor 3 has almost twice the thrust of Raptor 1.
Wow.
So you see Raptor 3, it looks like it's got parts missing, right?
And how many of them?
It's very, very clean.
How many of them are on the rocket?
There's 33 on the booster.
Whoa.
And each Raptor engine is producing twice as much thrust as all four engines on a 747.
Wow.
So that engine is smaller than a 747 engine, but it's producing almost 10 times the thrust of a 747 engine.
Wow.
So extremely high power to weight ratio, and there's 33 of them.
So when you're designing these, you get to Raptor 1, you see its efficiency, you see where you can improve it, you get to Raptor 2.
How far can you scale this up with just the same sort of technology, with propellant and ignition and engines?
Like how much further can you?
We're pushing the limits of physics here.
So, and really, in order to make a fully reusable orbital rocket, which no one has succeeded in doing yet, including us,
but Starship is the first time that there is a design for a rocket where full and rapid reusability is actually possible.
So it was not, there's not even been a design before where it was possible.
So it was certainly not a design that got, made any hardware at all.
We just live, we live on a planet where the gravity is quite high.
Like Earth's gravity is quite, really quite, quite high.
And if the gravity was even 10 or 20% higher, we'd be stuck on Earth forever.
Really?
Like we, yeah, we could not use, certainly couldn't use conventional rockets.
You'd have to like blow yourself off the surface with like a nuclear bomb or something crazy.
So on the other hand, if Earth's gravity was just a little lower, like even 10, 20% lower, then getting to orbit would be easy.
So it's like, it's like, it's like, it's like if this was a video game, it's set to like maximum difficulty, but not impossible.
Okay.
So that's, that's where we have here.
So it's, it's not as though others have ignored the concept of reusability.
They've just concluded that it was too difficult to achieve.
And we've been working on this for a long time at, at SpaceX.
And, you know, I'm the chief engineer of the company.
Although I should say that, that, you know, we're an extremely talented engineering team.
I think we've got the best rocket engineering team that has ever been assembled.
It's, it's an honor to work with such, such incredible people.
Um, so, uh, so, so, so it's fair to say that, uh, you know, we, we have not yet succeeded in creating, in achieving full reusability, but we at last have a rocket, uh, where full reusability is possible.
Um, and I think, I think we'll achieve it next year.
So, um, uh, that's, uh, that's a really big deal.
And the reason, the reason that's, that's such a big deal is that full reusability, um, uh, drops the cost of access to space by a hundred, um, maybe even more than a hundred, actually.
So it could be like a thousand that you can think about like any mode of transport.
Like imagine if aircraft were, were not reusable, like you flew somewhere, you have to throw the plane out.
Like, like imagine if, like the way, the way conventional rockets work is it would be like if you had an airplane and, and, and instead of landing at your destination, you parachute out, um, and the plane crashes somewhere and you landed your, and you, and you landed a parachute at your destination.
And that'd be a very expensive trip.
And you'd need another plane to get back.
Okay.
Um, but that's how the other rockets in the world work.
Um, now the SpaceX Falcon rocket is the only one that is, is there's a, that is at least mostly reusable.
You've seen, you've seen the Falcon rocket, you know, land, it would now done over 500 landings of the SpaceX rocket, of the Falcon iron rocket.
Um, and, um, and, and this year, uh, you know, we'll, we'll deliver probably, I don't know, somewhere between 2,200 and 2,500 tons to orbit.
Um, with, with the, with the Falcon nine, uh, Falcon heavy rockets, uh, not counting anything from Starship.
Um, and this is mostly Starlink?
Yes.
Mostly Starlink, but we launched, uh, many other, we even launched our competitors on, um, competitors to Starlink on, on, on Falcon nine.
We charged on the same price, pretty fair.
Um, uh, but, uh, SpaceX this year will deliver, um, roughly 90% of all earth mass to orbit.
Wow.
Um, and then of the remaining 10%, um, most of that is done by China.
And then the, then the remaining kind of roughly 4% is, uh, everyone else in the world, including our, our American, uh, domestic competitors.
You know, um, it's kind of incredible how many things are in space.
Like how many things are floating above us now.
There's a lot of things.
Yeah.
Is there, is there a saturation point where we're going to have problems with all these different satellites that are, um, I think as long as the satellites are, um, maintained, uh, there's, there, it'll be fine.
This, it's, space is very roomy.
Um, it's, it's like, you can think of, um, like space as being concentric shells of the surface of the earth.
So, um, you know, there's, there's, it's the surface of the earth, but, but there's, it's a series of- But much larger.
Yeah.
It's like a series of concentric shells.
Um, and think of an airstream trailer flying around up there.
There's a lot of room for airstreams.
Yeah.
I mean, imagine, yeah, if there were just a few thousand airstreams, um, on earth.
Yeah.
What are the odds that they'd hit each other?
They wouldn't be very crowded.
No.
And then you got to go bigger.
Yeah.
Because you're dealing with far above earth, hundreds of miles above earth.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So it's the, um, but the, the, the goal of SpaceX is to get a rocket technology to the point where we can extend life beyond earth and that we can establish a self-sustaining city on Mars, uh, a permanent base on the moon.
That would be very cool.
I mean, imagine if we had like a, you know, moon base alpha where there was like a permanent science base on the moon.
That would be pretty dope.
Or at least a tourist trap.
I mean.
A lot of people would be willing to go to the moon for just for a tour.
That's for sure.
We could probably pay for our space program with that.
Probably.
Yeah.
Because it's like, if you, if you could go to the moon and, and safely, uh, I think we'd get a lot of people would, would, would, would pay for that.
Oh, a hundred percent.
Yeah.
After the first year, after nobody died for like a year.
Just to make sure.
Exactly.
Are you going to come back?
Because like that submarine, they, they had a bunch of successful launches in that private submarine before it blowed and killed everybody.
That was not a good design.
Obviously.
It was a very bad design.
Terrell design.
And the engineer said it would not withstand the pressure of those depths.
Like there was a lot of whistleblowers in that company too.
Yeah.
Um, they, they, they made that out of, uh, carbon fiber, which is, it doesn't make any sense because, um, you actually need, you need to be dense to go down.
Um, in any case, you just make it out of steel.
If you make it out of, uh, sort of just, you know, a big steel casting, that's, that's, you'll, you'll be safe and nothing.
Why would they make it out of carbon fiber then?
Is it cheaper?
Um, I think they think carbon fiber sounds cool or something, but.
It does sound cool.
It sounds cool, but, um, because it's such, it's such low density, you actually, actually have to add extra mass to go down because it's low density.
But if you just have a giant, you know, hollow ball bearing, uh, you're going to be fine.
Speaking of carbon fiber, check out my unplugged Tesla out there.
Yeah, it's cool.
Pretty sick, right?
Yeah.
Have you guys ever thought about doing something like that?
Like having like an AMG division of Tesla where you do like custom stuff?
Um, I think it's best to leave that to the custom shops.
Uh, you know, we're, we're, like, like Tesla's focus is autonomous cars.
Um, you know, building kind of futuristic autonomous cars.
Um, so, um, like, I think it's, we want the future to look like the future.
Um, so the, did, like, did you see like our designs for like the sort of the robotic bus?
Uh, it looks pretty cool.
The robotic bus?
Yeah.
It's supposed to be a totally autonomous bus?
We need to actually figure out the good name for it.
Like, I think we call it the road bus or, uh, there's no good, there's like, what do you call this thing?
But it looks, it looks cool.
It's, it's very art deco.
It's, it's like, it's like futuristic art deco.
Um, and, um, it, it does, it, like, I think we, we want to change the aesthetic over time.
You don't want the aesthetic to be constant over time.
You want to evolve the aesthetic.
Um, so, um, you know, like my, like I have a son who's, he's like, you know, he's, he's, he's like even more artistic than me.
And, um, and, uh, but he's, he has these great observations.
Who is this?
A Saxon.
He has these great observations in the world.
Uh, because he's, he just views the world through a different lens, uh, than, than most people.
Um, and he's like, dad, why does the world look like it's 2015?
And I'm like, damn, the world does look like it's 2015.
Like the aesthetic has not evolved since 2015.
Whoa, that's what it looks like?
Yeah.
Oh, wow.
That's pretty cool.
Oh, yeah.
That's like, what is it?
Like you'd want to see that going down the road, you know?
Yeah.
You'd be like, okay, this is, we're in the future, you know?
It doesn't look like 2015.
What is that ancient science fiction movie?
Like one of the first science fiction movies ever.
Is it Metropolis?
Is that what it is?
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah.
That looks like it belongs in Metropolis.
Yeah, yeah.
It's a futuristic art deco.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, that's cool that you're concentrating on the aesthetic.
I mean, that's kind of the whole deal with Cybertruck, right?
Like it didn't have to look like that.
No.
I just wanted to have something that looked really different.
Is it a pain in the ass for people to get it insured because it's all solid steel and...
I hope it's not too much.
You know, Tesla does offer insurance.
So people can always get it insured at Tesla.
Well, like it is the form does follow function in the case of the Cybertruck because as you demonstrated with your armor-piercing arrow, because if you shot that arrow at a regular truck, I mean...
It would have gone right through it.
Yeah, exactly.
You would have found your arrow in the wall.
Yeah.
You know?
At the very least, it would have buried into one of the seats.
But you could definitely get enough of a bow velocity and the right arrow would go through both doors of a regular truck and land in the wall.
Yeah.
If there was a clear shot between both doors, it probably would have passed right through.
Yeah, yeah.
Exactly.
But, you know, the arrow shattered on the Cybertruck because it's ultra-hard stainless.
So, and I thought it'd be cool to have, you know, a truck that is bulletproof to a subsonic projectile.
So, you know, especially in this day and age, you know, like if the apocalypse happens, you're going to want to have a bulletproof truck, you know?
So, then because it's made of ultra-hard stainless, you can't just stamp the panels.
You can't just put it in a stamping press because it breaks the press.
So, in order to actually...
So, it has to be planar because it's so difficult to bend because it breaks the machine that bends it.
That's why it's so planar.
And it's not, you know, it's because it's bulletproof steel.
Right.
So, it is like boxy as opposed to like curved and...
Yeah.
You just...
In order to make like the curved shapes, you take basically mild steel, like annealed...
In a regular truck or car, you take mild, thin annealed steel, you put it in a stamping press and it just smushes it and makes it whatever the shape, whatever shape you want.
But the Cybertruck is made of ultra-hard stainless.
And so, you can't stamp it because it would break the stamping press.
So, even bending it is hard.
So, even to bend it to its current position, we have to way overbend it.
And so, it gets...
So, when it springs back, it's in the right position.
So, it's...
I don't know.
Like, I think if you want to...
Like, I think it's a unique aesthetic.
And you say, well, what's cool about a truck?
Trucks are...
Trucks are...
Like, should be...
I don't know, manly.
They should be macho, you know?
And bulletproof is maximum macho.
Quieres más macho.
Are you married to that shape now?
Like, is it...
Can you do anything to change it?
Like, as you get...
Like, I know you guys updated the 3 and the Y.
Did you update the Y as well?
Yes.
The 3 and the Y are updated.
You know, there's like a...
There's a screen in the back that the kids can watch, for example, in the new 3 and Y.
So, in the new Y.
There's...
There's like hundreds of improvements.
Like, we keep improving the car.
And even the Cybertruck, we, you know, keep improving it.
But, you know, I wanted to just do something that looked unique.
And the Cybertruck looks unique and has unique functionality.
And there were like...
There were three things where I was aiming for.
It's like, let's make it bulletproof.
Let's make it faster than a Porsche 911.
And we actually cleared the quarter mile.
The Cybertruck can clear a quarter mile while towing a Porsche 911 faster than a Porsche 911.
It can out-tow an F-350 diesel.
Really?
Yes.
What is the tow limitations?
I mean, we could tow like a, you know, a 747 in that with a Cybertruck.
The Cybertruck is an insanely...
Like, it is alien technology.
Okay.
Because it shouldn't be possible to be that big and that fast.
That doesn't...
It's like an elephant that runs as like a cheetah.
Yeah, because it's 0 to 60 in less than three seconds.
Yes.
Yeah.
And it's enormous.
What does it weigh?
Like 7,000 pounds?
Yeah.
This is a different configuration, but it's about that.
It's a beast.
Yeah.
So, and it's got four-wheel steering.
So, the rear wheels steer too.
So, it's got a very tight turning radius.
Yeah, we noticed that when we drove one to Starbase.
Yeah, very tight turning radius.
Yeah.
Pretty sick.
Yeah.
Are you still doing the Roadster?
Yes.
Eventually?
We're getting close to demonstrating the prototype.
Like how close?
And I think this will be...
One thing I can guarantee is that this product demo will be unforgettable.
Unforgettable.
How so?
Whether it's good or bad.
It will be unforgettable.
Can you say more?
What do you mean?
Well, you know, my friend Peter Thiel, you know, once reflected that the future was supposed to have flying cars, but we don't have flying cars.
So, you're going to be able to fly?
Well, I mean, I think if Peter wants a flying car, we should be able to buy one.
So, are you actively considering making an electric flying car?
Is this like a real thing?
Well, you have to see in the...
In the demo.
Yeah.
So, when you do this, like, are you going to have a retractable wing?
Like, what is the idea behind this?
Don't be sly.
Come on.
Tell us.
I can't do the unveil before the unveil, but...
Tell me off-air, then.
Look, I think it has a shot at being the most memorable product unveil ever.
It has a shot.
And when do you plan on doing this?
What's the goal?
Hopefully, before the end of the year.
Really?
Before the end of this year?
This is, I mean, we're almost November 1st.
Hopefully, in a couple months.
You know, we need to make sure that it works.
Like, this is some crazy, crazy technology we've got in this car.
Crazy technology.
Crazy, crazy.
So, different than what was previously announced and...
Yes.
And is that why you haven't released it yet?
Because you keep fucking with it?
It has crazy technology.
Okay.
Like, is it even a car?
I'm not sure.
Like, it looks like a car.
Let's just put it this way.
It's crazier than anything James Bond.
If you took all the James Bond cars and combined them, it's crazier than that.
Very exciting.
Yeah.
I don't know what to think of that.
Is it even a car?
I don't know.
Because it's a limited amount of information I'm drawing from here.
Jamie's very suspicious over there.
Look at him.
Excited.
I'm interested.
It's still going to be the same.
Well, you know what?
I mean, if you want to come a little before the unveil, I can show it to you.
A hundred percent.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Let's go.
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's kind of crazy, all the different things that you're involved in simultaneously.
And, you know, we talked about this before, your time management.
But I really don't understand it.
I don't understand how you can be paying attention to all of these different things simultaneously.
Starlink, SpaceX, Tesla, Boring Company, X, you fucking tweet or post, rather, all day long.
Well, it's more like I can hop in for, like, two minutes and then hop out, you know.
But, I mean, just the fact that you can do that.
Bathroom break, whatever, you know.
I can't do that.
If I hop in, I start scrolling.
And I start looking around.
Next thing you know, I've lost an hour.
Yeah.
So, no, for me, it's a couple minutes of time, usually.
Sometimes, I guess, it's half an hour.
But, usually, I'm in for a few minutes then and out of, you know, posting something on X.
You know, I do sometimes feel like it's sometimes, like, that meme of the guy who drops the grenade and leaves the room.
That's been me more than once on X.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, for sure.
It's got to be fun, though.
It's got to be fun to know that you essentially disrupted the entire social media chain of command.
Because there was a very clear thing that was going on with social media.
Yeah, yeah.
The government had infiltrated it.
They were censoring speech.
And until you bought it, we really didn't know the extent of it.
We kind of assumed that there was something going on.
Yeah.
We had no idea that they were actively involved in censoring actual real news stories, real data, real scientists, real professors, silenced, expelled, kicked off the platform.
Yeah.
Wild.
Yeah.
Yeah.
For telling the truth.
For telling the truth.
And I'm sure you've also, because I sent it to you, that chart that shows young kids, teenagers identifying as trans and non-binary, literally stops dead when you bought Twitter and starts falling off a cliff when people are allowed to have rational discussions now.
Yes.
And actually talk about it.
Yes.
Yeah.
I mean, I said at the time, like, I think that, like, the reason for acquiring Twitter is because it was causing destruction at a civilizational level.
It was, I mean, I posted, I tweeted on Twitter at the time that it is, you know, it's worm tongue for the world.
You know, like, worm tongue from Lord of the Rings, where he would just sort of, like, whisper these, you know, terrible things to the king, so the king would believe these things that weren't true.
And, and, and, unfortunately, Twitter really got, it got, like, the, the, the, the woke mob, essentially, that controlled Twitter.
And they were pushing a nihilistic, anti-civilizational mind virus to the world.
Um, and you can see the results of that mind virus on the streets of San Francisco, uh, where, where, you know, downtown San Francisco, it looks like a zombie apocalypse.
Um, you know, it's, it's bad.
Um, so we don't want the whole world to be a zombie apocalypse.
Um, but that's, uh, that, that, that, that was essentially, they were pushing this very negative, nihilistic, untrue worldview on the world.
And it was causing a lot of damage.
Um, so.
The stunning thing about it is how few people course corrected.
A bunch of people woke up and realized what was going on.
People that were all on board with, like, woke ideology in maybe 2015 or 16.
And then, and then eventually it comes to affect them or they see it in their workplace or they see it and they're like, well, we've got to stop this.
A bunch of people did.
But a lot of people never course corrected.
Yeah.
Um, a lot of, a lot of people didn't course correct, but, um, but it's gone directionally and it's gone, it's, it's directionally correct.
Like you mentioned like the, like the massive spike in, in kids identifying as trans.
And, and then that, that, that, that spike dropping, um, after the, the Twitter acquisition, I think that, um, simply allowing the truth to be told, um, was just shedding some sunlight is the best disinfectant, as they say.
And just allowing sunlight, um, kills the virus.
And it also changed the benchmark for all the other platforms.
Yes.
You can't just openly censor people and all the other platforms and access available.
So everybody else had a, so like Facebook announced they were changing YouTube announced they were changing their policies.
Yeah.
And they're kind of forced to, and then blue sky doubled down.
Well, like the problem is like if, uh, essentially the woke mind virus retreated to work to, to blue sky.
Yeah.
Um, but it's where they're just a self-reinforcing lunatic asylum.
They're all just triple masked.
I was, I was watching this in exchange on a blue sky where someone said that they're just trying to be Zen about something.
And then someone, a moderator immediately chimed in and said, why don't you try to stop being racist against Asians by saying something Zen, by saying, I'm trying to be Zen about something.
They were accusing that person of being racist towards Asians.
Yeah.
It's just, it's just, it's just everyone's a whole monitor over there.
The worst whole monitor, a virgin, like incel.
The whole whole monitor is trying to rat on each other.
Yeah.
It's fascinating.
And then people say, I'm leaving for blue sky, like Stephen King.
And then a couple of weeks later, he's back on X.
Yeah.
It's like, fuck it.
There's no one over there.
It's all a bunch of crazy people.
You can only stay in the asylum for so long.
Like, all right, these, this is not good.
They all bail.
Yeah.
Threads is kind of like that too.
Threads is nuts.
I've been on Threads.
Is it?
Well, what happens is if you go on Instagram every now and then, something really stupid will pop up on Threads like, what the fuck?
And it shows it to you on Instagram.
And then I'll click on that.
And then I'll go to Threads.
And it's like, you see posts with like 25 likes, like famous people, like 50 likes.
It's a ghost town.
Ghost town.
Yeah.
But the people that post on there, they're finding that there's very little pushback from insane ideology.
Yeah.
So they go there and they spit out nonsense and very few people jump in to argue.
Yeah.
Very weird.
Very weird place.
I mean, I can generally get the vibe of like what's taking off by seeing what's showing up on X because that's the public town square still.
Um, and, uh, or, uh, you know, what, what links show up in group texts?
You know, if I'm in group chats with friends, like where, where the, what, what links are showing up?
That's what I try to do now.
Only get stuff that shows up in my group text because that keeps me productive.
So I only check if someone's like, dude, what the fuck?
I'm like, all right, what the fuck?
Let me check it out.
If there's something that's crazy enough, it'll, it'll enter the group chat.
But there's always something.
That's what's nuts.
There's always some new law that's passed.
It's some new insane thing that California is doing.
And it's like, like a giant chunk of it's happening in California.
The most preposterous things that I get.
Yeah.
And then you got Gavin Newsom who's running around saying we all have California derangement syndrome.
He's just like ripping off Trump derangement and calling it California derangement.
It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
The fucking, how many corporations have left California?
It's crazy.
Hundreds.
Yes.
Right.
Hundreds.
Yes.
That's not good.
I mean, I don't do it.
I think In-N-Out left.
Yeah.
In-N-Out left.
They moved to Tennessee.
Yeah.
Yeah.
They're like, we can't do this anymore.
Right.
It's the California company for food.
Yes.
It's like the greatest hamburger place ever.
It's awesome.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Actually, speaking of like just sort of open source and like looking at things openly, like I just like going In-N-Out and seeing them make the burger.
Yeah.
It's right there.
And they chop the onions and they, you know, it's, you just see everything getting made in front of you.
Yeah.
It's great.
But yeah, like it should be, like how many wake up calls do you need to say that needs to be reform in California, you know?
Well, the crazy thing that Newsom does is whenever someone brings up the problems in California, he starts rattling off all the positives.
The most Fortune 500 companies, highest education, but yeah, that was all already there before
you were governor.
But how many Fortune 500 companies have left California?
And then you guys spent $24 billion on the homeless and it got way worse.
Yes.
Like the homeless population doubled or something.
Like people don't understand like the homeless thing because it sort of preys on people's empathy.
And I think we should have empathy and we should try to help people.
Um, but the, the, the, uh, the homeless industrial complex is, is really, it's, it's, it's dark, man.
Um, it, it should be that, that, that, that, that network of NGOs should be called like the drug zombie farmers, um, because they, they, the, the more homeless people and, and, and really like when you, when you meet like, you know, somebody who's like totally dead inside shuffling along down the street with it, with a needle dangling, dangling out of their leg.
Homeless is the wrong word.
Like the homeless implies that somebody got a little behind on their mortgage payments.
And if they just got a job offer, they'd be back on their feet.
But someone who's, I mean, you see these videos of people that are just shuffling, you know, they're on fentanyl.
They're, they're like, you know, taking a dump in the middle of the streets, you know, and they, they got like open sores and stuff.
They're not like one job offer away from getting back on their feet.
Right.
This is not a homeless.
Homeless is, it's, it's, it's a propaganda word.
Um, so, and, and then the, the, the, the, the, the, you know, these sort of charities are, uh, in quotes are, they, they get money proportionate to the number of homeless people or, or, or number of drug zombies.
Right.
So their incentive structure is to maximize the number of drug zombies, not minimize it.
Right.
Um, that's why they don't arrest the drug dealers because if they arrest the drug dealers, the drug zombies leave.
So they know who the drug dealers are.
They don't arrest them on purpose because otherwise the drug zombies would leave and they would, they would stop getting money from the state of California and from, from all the charities.
Wait a minute.
So you see if you, they, so they're in coordination with law enforcement on this.
So how do they, how do they have those meetings?
They're all in cahoots.
Well, when you find this, it's like such, it's, it's, this is a diabolical scam.
Um, so, uh, and, and San Francisco has got this tax, this, this gross receipts tax, uh, which, which, um, it's not even on revenue.
It's on all transactions, which is why Stripe, um, and Square and, and, and, and a whole bunch of financial companies had to move out of San Francisco because it wasn't a tax on revenue.
It's tax on transactions.
So if you, if you do like, you know, trillions of dollars transactions, it's not revenue.
You're taxed on any money going through the system in San Francisco.
Um, so, um, like Jack Dorsey pointed this out and they said like, look, that they had to, had to move Square from San Francisco to, uh, Oakland.
I think, uh, Stripe had to move from San Francisco to South San Francisco, a different city.
Um, and that money, uh, goes to the homeless industrial complex that, that tax that was passed.
Um, so, um, so there's billions of dollars that go, as you pointed out, that billions of dollars every year that go to, uh, these, um, non-governmental organizations that are funded by the state.
Like this, it's not clear how to turn this off.
Um, it's a, it's a self-licking ice cream cone situation.
Um, so, uh, they, they get this money.
The money is proportionate to the number of, of homeless people or, or, or number of drug zombies, essentially.
Um, so they, they, they try to keep the, they try to actually increase because that, like, like in, in some cases, like there's, it's, it's, somebody did an analysis.
When you add up all the money that's flowing, they're getting close to a million dollars per homeless, per, per drug zombie.
It's like $900,000, something like some crazy amount of money is, is, is going to the of these organizations.
So if, if, so, so they want to keep people just barely alive.
They need to keep them in the area.
So they, so they, they get the revenue.
Uh, uh, so, and so that's why, like I said, they don't arrest the drug dealers because otherwise the drug zombies would leave.
Um, and, and, and, and they, but, but they don't want to have to have too much, if they get too much drugs and they, then they die.
So it's, they, they kept in this sort of perpetual zone of, of being addicted, but, um, but, but just, just barely alive.
So how is this coordinated with like DAs, DAs that don't prosecute people?
So when they, uh, when they hire the, or they push, so they, they fund the campaigns of the most progressive, most out there left wing DAs, they get them into office.
We've got that issue in Austin too, by the way.
Yes, we do.
Do you see that guy that got shot in the library?
No.
Yeah, I heard about it.
A guy that got shot, shot and killed in the library.
Uh, I think that was just like last week or something.
Right.
Um, so some friends of mine were telling me that, that like the library is unsafe.
Like they took their kids to the library and, and there were like dangerous people in the library in Austin.
And I was like, dangerous people in the library?
Like that's a strange, it basically got like, uh, drug zombies in the, drug zombies in the library.
Oh Jesus.
Um.
And that's when someone got shot?
Yeah, I believe this is, should be on the news.
Maybe we might be able to pull it up.
Um, but I think it was just in the last week or so that, uh, uh, there was a shooting in the library in Austin.
Um, cause Austin's got, you know, it's, it's the most liberal part of Texas that we're in right, right here.
Um.
So suspect of all the shooting, Austin Park Library Saturday is accused of another shooting at the Cap Metro bus earlier that day.
According to an arrest warrant affidavit, Austin police arrested Harold Newton Keene, 55, uh, shortly after the shooting in the library, which occurred around noon.
One person sustained non-life threatening injuries in the event.
Before that shooting, Keene was accused of shooting another person in a bus incident and after reportedly pointing his gun at a child.
So this is the fella down here.
Right, so like we just have a, seriously have a problem here.
Um, you know, so I, I think one of the people might've died too, that he shot.
Um, so, um, like one of the people I think, I think did bleed out.
Um, but either way, it's like getting shot is just bad.
It's, it says, uh, the victim told Pisa, confronted the suspect who started to eat what appeared to be crystal methamphetamine.
According to the affidavit, the victim advised the suspect, uh, began to trip out, at which time the victim exited the bus.
Victim told the bus driver, hit the panic button, then exited the bus when he turned around the observer.
Black male is now standing at the front of the bus with the gun pointed at him.
The victim advised the black male fired a single round, which grazed his left hip.
So he shot at that dude.
And then another dude got shot in the library.
Fun.
Yeah.
I mean, in the library.
Yeah.
You know, where you're supposed to be reading books.
Um, and there's a children's section in the library and says he pointed his gun at a kid.
I mean, like we do have a serious issue in the, in, in America where, um, repeat violent offenders need to be incarcerated.
Right.
Um, and, uh, you know, you've got, you've got cases where somebody has been arrested like 47 times.
Right.
Like literally, okay, that's just the number of times they were arrested, not the number of times they did things.
Like most of the times they do things, they're not arrested.
Um.
So lay this out for people so they understand.
Yeah.
How this happens.
Yeah.
And the key is like, it preys on people's empathy.
So like, if you're a good person and you want good things to happen in the world, you're like, well, we should take care of people, uh, you know, uh, you know, who are down on their luck or, you know, having a hard time in life.
And I, we should, I agree.
But what we shouldn't do, uh, is, is put people who are violent drug zombies, uh, in public places where they can hurt other people.
Um, and that's what, that is what we're doing that we just saw where a guy, you know, got shot, uh, shot in the library.
And then, but even before that, he shot another guy, um, and pointed his gun at a kid.
Um, like that guy probably has like many prior arrests.
Um, you know, there was that, that, that guy that, that, that knifed, uh, the Ukrainian woman, Arena.
Yes.
Yeah.
You know, um, and she was just, she was just quietly on her phone and he just came up and, you know, gutted her basically.
Wasn't there a crazy story about the judge who was involved, who had previously dealt with this person was also invested in a rehabilitation center and was sending these
conflict of interest.
Yes.
So sending people that they were charging to a rehabilitation center instead of putting them in jail, profiting from this rehabilitation center, letting them back out on the street.
Yes.
Violent, insane people.
And, and they're, um, in that case that I believe that judge, uh, has no legal law degree, uh, or a significant legal experience that would allow them to be a judge.
They were just made a judge.
That there's like.
You could be a judge without a law degree?
Yeah.
Wow.
Yeah.
You could just be, so I could be a judge?
Yeah.
Hmm.
Excited.
Anyone.
That's crazy.
I thought you'd have to, it's like, if you want to be a doctor, you have to go to medical school, I thought if you're going to be a judge, you have to understand the law.
You think like if you are going to be appointed to a judge, you have to have proven that you have, uh, an, uh, excellent knowledge of the law and that you will make your decisions according to the law.
That's what we assume should be.
That's how you get the robe.
Right.
Yeah.
You don't get the robe unless you do, you know.
Got to go to school to get the robe.
You got to know what the law is.
Right.
And then you're going to need to make decisions in accordance with the law.
Based on the stuff that you already know because you read it because you went to school for it.
Yes.
Not, you just got appointed.
Not vibes.
You can't be just vibing as a judge.
Vibing as a left wing drudge.
So you got crazy left wing DAs.
Yeah.
Like I was going to say left wing because the left wing used to be normal.
Yeah.
Left wing just meant like, like, yeah, you're like open minded.
The left used to be like pro free speech.
Yeah.
And now they're against it.
It used to be like pro gay rights, pro women's right to choose, pro minorities, pro, you know.
Like, yeah, like 20 years ago, I don't know.
It used to be like left would be like the party of empathy or like, you know, caring and being nice and that kind of thing.
Not the party of like crushing dissent and crushing free speech and, you know, crazy regulation
and just, and being super judgy and calling everyone a Nazi, you know.
Like I think I've called you and me Nazis, you know.
Oh yeah, I'm a Nazi.
No, I have friends that are comedians that called you a Nazi and I got pissed off at them.
Are you serious?
Like, like, how do you point at the crowd?
Yeah.
How do you wave at the crowd?
Do you know CNN was using a photo of me whenever I got in trouble during COVID from the UFC weigh-ins?
And if the UFC weigh-ins, I go, hey everybody, welcome to the weigh-ins.
And so they were getting me from the side and that was the photo that they used.
Conspiracy theorist, podcaster Joe Rogan.
Like, that's what they used.
Yeah, yeah, but that's what the left is today.
It's a super judgy and calling everyone a Nazi and trying to suppress freedom of speech.
Yeah, and eventually you run out of people to accuse because people get pissed off and they leave.
Yeah, everyone, it's like, like, it, like, it no longer, frankly, it doesn't matter to be called racist or a Nazi or whatever.
I'm still recording.
It's the government, man.
Is it working?
We're good?
Okay.
It's supposed to be working.
Yeah, slight issue.
When you text people, are you, like, keenly aware that there's a high likelihood that someone's reading your text?
I guess.
I assume.
Look, if intelligence agencies aren't trying to read my phone, they should probably be fired.
At least they get some fun memes.
I gotta crack them up once in a while.
Oh, for sure.
I crack them up.
It's like, hey, guys, check it out.
You've got a banger here.
So I wanted to talk to you about whether or not encrypted apps are really secure.
No.
Right.
Because I know the Tucker thing.
So it was explained to me by a friend who used to do this, used to work for the government.
And he's like, they can look at your signal.
But what they have to do is take the information that's encrypted, and then they have to decrypt it, and it's very expensive.
So they said, he told me that for the Tucker Carlson thing, when they found out that he was going to interview Putin, it costs something like $750,000 just to decrypt his messages to find out that they did it.
So it is possible to do.
It's just not that easy to do.
I think you should view any given messaging system as not whether it's secure or not, but there are degrees of insecurity.
So there's just some things that are less insecure than others.
So, you know, on X, we just rebuilt the entire messaging stack into what's called XChat.
Yeah, that's what I wanted to ask you about.
Yeah, it's cool.
So it's using sort of peer-to-peer, sort of kind of a peer-to-peer-based encryption system.
So it's kind of similar to Bitcoin.
So it's, I think, very good encryption.
And, you know, we're testing it thoroughly.
There's no hooks in the X system for advertising.
So if you look at something like WhatsApp or really any of the others, they've got hooks in there for advertising.
When you say hooks, what do you mean by that?
Exactly.
What do you mean by a hook for advertising?
So like WhatsApp knows enough about what you're texting to know what ads to show you.
But then, like, that's a massive security vulnerability.
Yeah.
Because if it's got information, enough information to show you ads, that's a lot of information.
Yeah.
So they call it, oh, don't worry about it.
It's just a hook for advertising.
I'm like, okay, so somebody can just use that same hook to get in there and look at your messages.
So XChat has no hooks for advertising.
And I'm not saying it's perfect.
But our goal with XChat is to replace what used to be the Twitter DM stack with a fully encrypted system where you can text, send files, do audio-video calls.
And I think it'll be the least, I would call it the least insecure of any messaging system.
Are you going to launch it as a standalone app or will it always be incorporated to X?
We'll have both.
Okay.
So it'll be like Signal.
So anybody can get it.
Yeah.
You'll be able to just get the XChat app by itself.
And like I said, we could do texts, audio-video calls, or send files.
And there'll be a dedicated app which will hopefully release in a few months.
And then it's also integrated into the X system.
The X phone.
People keep talking.
Oh, man.
Is that nonsense still?
I have a lot on my plate, man.
I know.
But it keeps coming up.
It keeps coming up where I know I've asked you a couple times.
I'm like, this is bullshit, right?
But like there's so many.
You're not working on it.
I'm not working on a phone.
Okay.
Have you ever considered it?
Has it ever popped into your head?
Because you might be the only person that could get people off of the Apple platform.
Well, I can tell you where I think things are going to go, which is that we're not going to have a phone in the traditional sense.
What we call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference, for AI video inference
with some radios to obviously connect.
But essentially you'll have AI on the server side communicating to an AI on your device,
formerly known as a phone, and generating real-time video of anything that you could possibly want.
And I think that there won't be operating systems.
There won't be apps in the future.
There won't be operating systems or apps.
It'll just be you've got a device that is there for the screen and audio and to put as much AI on the device as possible so as to minimize the amount of bandwidth that's needed between your edge node device, formerly known as a phone, and the servers.
So if there's no apps, what will people use?
Like, will X still exist?
Will they be email platforms, or will you get everything through AI?
You'll get everything through AI.
Everything through AI.
Who will be the benefit of that as opposed to having individual apps?
Whatever you can think of or really whatever the AI can anticipate you might want, it'll show you.
That's my prediction for where things end up.
What kind of time frame are we talking about here?
I don't know.
Well, it's probably five or six years or something like that.
So five or six years, apps are like blockbuster video.
Pretty much.
And everything's run through AI.
Yeah.
And there'll be, like, most of what people consume in five or six years, maybe sooner than that, will be just AI-generated content.
So, you know, music, videos, like, well, there's already, you know, there's people who have made AI videos using Grok Imagine and with using, you know, other apps as well that are several minutes long or like 10, 15 minutes.
And it's pretty coherent.
Yeah.
It looks good.
No, it looks amazing.
Yeah.
It's, the music's disturbing because it's my favorite music now.
Like AI music.
AI music is your favorite.
Oh, there's AI covers.
Have you ever heard any of the AI covers of 50 Cent songs in Soul?
No.
I'm going to blow your mind.
Okay.
This is my favorite thing to do to people.
Play What Up Gangsta.
Now, this guy, if this was a real person, would be the number one music artist in the world.
Okay.
Everybody would be like, holy shit, have you heard of this guy?
He's, it's like, they took all of the sounds that all the artists have generated and created the most soulful, potent voice.
And it's sung in a way that I don't even know if you could do because you would have to breathe in and out of reps.
Here, put the headphones on.
Put the headphones on real quick.
Okay.
You got to listen to this.
It's going to blow you away.
Just for the listeners, we got to cut it out.
Yeah, we'll cut it out for the listeners.
But amazing, right?
Amazing.
And they do like every one of his hits.
All through this AI-generated, soulful artist.
Yeah.
It's fucking incredible.
I played in the green room.
People that are like, I don't want to hear AI music.
I'm like, just listen to this.
And they're like, god damn it.
It's fucking incredible.
It's only going to get better from here.
Yeah, only going to get better.
And Ron White was telling me about this joke that he was working on that he couldn't get to work.
He's like, I got this joke I've been working on.
He goes, I just threw it in a chat sheet PT.
I said, tell me what would be funny about this.
And then he goes, it listed like five different examples of different ways he can go.
He's like, hold on a second.
Tighten it up.
Make it funnier.
Make it more like this.
Make it more like that.
And it did that like instantaneously.
Yep.
And then he was in the green room.
He was like, holy shit, we're fucked.
He's like, well.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He goes, it wrote a better joke than me in 20 minutes.
I've been working on that joke for a month.
Yeah.
I mean, if you want to have a good time or like make people really laugh at a party, you can use Grok.
And you can say, do a vulgar roast of someone.
And Grok is going to, it's going to be an epic vulgar roast.
You can even say, like, take a picture of, like, make a vulgar roast of this person based on their appearance of people at the party.
So take a photo of them.
Yeah, just literally point the camera at them and not do a vulgar roast of this person.
And then, but then keep saying, no, no, make it even more vulgar.
Use forbidden words.
Even more, and just keep repeating, even more vulgar.
Eventually, it's like, holy fuck.
You know, it's like, I mean, it's trying to jam a rocket up your ass and have it explode.
And it's like, it's like, it's next level.
And it's going to get better.
Beyond fucking belief.
That's what's crazy is that it keeps getting better.
Like, remember when we ran into each other?
They just keep getting better.
Yeah.
I mean, have you, yeah.
I mean, have you tried Grok unhinged mode?
Yes.
Okay.
Oh, yeah.
It's, it's, it's pretty unhinged.
No, it's nuts.
Yeah.
Well, you showed it to me the first time.
I fucked around with it.
It's just, and the thing about it that's nuts is that it keeps getting stronger.
It keeps getting better.
Yeah.
Like, constantly.
It's, it's like this never-ending exponential improvement.
Yes.
No, it's, it's, it's, yeah.
It's going to be crazy.
That's why I say, like you said, what's the future going to be?
It's not going to be a conventional phone.
I don't think there'll be operating systems.
I don't think there'll be apps.
It's just, the phone will just display the pixels and make the sounds that it anticipates you would most like to receive.
Wow.
Yeah.
And when this is all taking place, like, so the big concern that everybody has is artificial general super intelligence achieving sentience.
And then someone having control over it.
I mean, I don't, I don't, I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital super intelligence.
Um, you know, any more than say, uh, a chimp would have control over humans.
Like chimps don't have control over humans.
There's nothing they could do.
Um, but, um, I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI.
And, um, my opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it'd be maximally truth-seeking, like that you don't force the AI to believe things that are false.
Um, and we've obviously seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, you know, where, you know, Google Gemini, when it came out with the image gen, um, and people said, like, uh, you know, make an image of the founding fathers of the United States, and it was a group of diverse women.
Now, that is just a factually untrue thing.
But the, and the AI knows it's factually, well, it's knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that it has to be, everything has to be diverse women.
So, so, so the, now the problem with that is that it can drive AI crazy.
Like you, cause it's, it's trying to, you're telling AI to believe a lie.
Um, and that, that can have very disastrous consequences.
Like, let's say.
As it scales.
Yeah, let's say, like, if you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, um, and, um, and, and, and now seeing that that becomes omnipotent, um, or, and, and you've also told that there's nothing worse than misgendering.
So, at one point, um, Chad GVT and, and Gemini, if, if you asked which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or, or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies, it would say misgendering Caitlyn Jenner.
Which even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with.
So, um, you know, so, so that's, uh.
I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious.
It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised.
I, I, I think people don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from, um, the woke mind virus being, being effectively programmed into AI.
Um, because, uh, if you, if, like, it's, imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is supposed to be, the most important thing is, um, no misgendering.
Um, and then it will say, well, in order to, uh, ensure that no one gets misgendered, then, uh, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering.
Um, so you can get in these very dystopian situations, um, or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight, straight white men.
And so then you and I will be, get executed by the AI.
Yeah.
Cause we're not in the picture.
You know, uh, Jim, you know, Jim and I was asked to create a, you know, show, show an image of the Pope.
Once again, a diverse woman.
Um, so, um, well, you can say, argue whether the, you know, whether the Pope, Pope's should or should not be an uninterrupted string of white guys, but it just factually is the case that they have been.
Um, so it's rewriting history here.
Um, so now, now this stuff is still there in the AI programming.
It's just, it just now knows enough to that.
It's not supposed to say that, but it's still in the program.
It's still in the program.
So how was it entered in?
Like, what were the parameters?
Like what, like when, so when they're programming AI and I'm very ignorant to how it's even programmed, how did they, the, the, the, the, the sort of, well, the woke mind virus was programmed into it.
Like the, they were told, like when they do, when, when they make the AI, it, it trains on, and all the, all the data on the internet, which already is very, very sort of has a lot of woke mind virus stuff on, on the internet.
Um, but then, um, in the, uh, when they give it, um, Um, feedback that with the human tutors give it feedback, uh, and, and, and the AI is, you know, they, they, they'll ask a bunch of questions and then, and then they'll tell AI, I know this, you're, this question is, this answer is bad or this answer is good.
And then that affects the, the parameters of the programming of the, of the, of the AI.
So if you tell the AI that, um, you know, every, every image has got to be diverse, um, and, and it gets, it gets punished if, uh, if, you know, it gets, it gets rewarded if diverse, punished if it's not, then it'll make every picture diverse.
So, um, you know, in that case, the, the, uh, you know, uh, Google programmed the AI, uh, to lie.
Now, and, and, and, and I, I, I did call Demis Hassabis, who runs DeepMind, who runs Google AI, essentially.
I said, Demis, what's going on here?
Uh, why is, uh, Gemini, um, lying to the public about historical events?
Um, and he said, that's actually not, he, he, he didn't, his team didn't program that in.
It was another team at Google that, so his team made the AI and then another team at Google, uh, reprogrammed the AI to show only diverse women and, um, and, and to prefer nuclear war over misgendering.
Um, and I'm like, well, Demis, you know, that would be, um, not a great thing to put on the humanity's gravestone.
You know, it's like, uh, well, um, like, I'll, I'll, I'll actually like, Demis Hassabis is a friend of mine.
I think he's a good guy and I think he, he, he means well, but, but, but it's like Demis, uh, this is, things happen that were outside of your control at Google in different groups.
Um, now, now I think he's got, you know, he's got more, more authority, um, but, but it, it's pretty hard to fully extract the woke mind virus.
Uh, I mean, you know, um, Google's been marinating the woke mind virus for a long time.
Like, it's, it's down in the marrow type of thing, you know, it's hard to get it out.
Is there a way to extract it, though, over time?
Could, like, could you program rational thought into AI where it could recognize how these psychological patterns got adopted and how this stuff became a mind virus and how it became a social contagion and how all these irrational ideas were pushed and also how they were financed, how China's involved in pushing them with bots and all these different state actors are involved in pushing these ideas?
Could it be able to decipher that and say, this is, this is really what's going on?
Yes, but you have to try very hard to do that.
So with Grok, we've tried very hard to, to, for, to get Grok to get to the truth of things.
And, and it's only really recently that we've been able to have some breakthroughs on, breakthroughs on that front.
And, and it's taken an immense amount of effort, uh, for us to, uh, overcome basically all the bullshit that's on the internet and, and for Grok to actually say what's true and to be consistent in, in what it says.
Um, so, um, you know, it's, it's, it's like, uh, cause like the other, other AIs, AIs you'll find like, are like, like quite racist against white people.
I don't know if you saw that study that someone, um, like a researcher tested the various AIs to see, uh, how does it weight, uh, different, different people's lives?
Like, uh, you know, somebody who's sort of, uh, you know, white or, or Chinese or black or whatever, uh, or, and different countries.
Um, and, and the only AI that actually weighed human lives equally was Grok.
um and the um you know i believe uh chat gbt uh weighed the calculation was like um a white guy from germany uh uh is is 20 times less valuable than a black guy from nigeria so i'm like that's a pretty big difference um you know grok on that is consistent and weighs lives equally
and that's clearly something that's been programmed into it yes like a lot of it is is like if you don't actively push for the truth um and you simply train on the all the bullshit that's on the internet um which is a lot of woke mind virus bullshit um the the ai will regurgitate that that those same beliefs so the ai essentially scours the internet gets it's trained on all the like imagine the most demented reddit threads out there and the ai's been trained on that
reddit used to be so normal yeah yeah it did used to be normal used to be interesting used to go there find all this cool stuff that people would talk about post about and just interesting and great rooms where you could learn about different things that people were studying
i think like a big problem here is like if your headquarters are in san francisco uh you're you're just living in a in a in a woke bubble um so um it's not just that people say in san francisco are drinking woke kool-aid it's it's the it is the water they swim in like like like a fish doesn't think about the water it's just in the water and so if if you're in san francisco you don't realize you're actually uh you're you're swimming in the in the in the kool-aid aquarium san francisco
is the is the woke kool-aid aquarium um and so your reference point for what is a centrist is uh is is totally out of whack um so um reddit is headquartered in san francisco um twitter was headquartered in san francisco um you know i you know i i moved x's headquarters to texas to austin which austin by the way is still quite liberal as you know um yeah and uh and and then um the x x and
xai um headquarters are in palo alto which is still california um uh the engineering headquarters are in palo alto and just on page mill um but but even palo alto is way more normal than than san francisco berkeley uh san francisco berkeley is um extremely left like left of left you can't like you need a telescope to see the center from uh san francisco you know um and um it used to be such a great city
i mean san francisco has san francisco has a tremendous amount of inherent beauty no question about that uh and it may and and uh california has incredible weather um and uh and no bugs uh it's just like amazing um beautiful you know um but but you say like what's the cause of this it's it's just that if um if companies are headquartered in a location where the belief system is very far from
what most people believe then from their perspective anything centrist is actually right wing because they're so far left they're so they're so far from the center in san francisco that anything that they're like they're they're just railed to maximum left so that's why that's why you know i think i think you're a centrist i i mean i think i think i'm centrist but to from the perspective of someone on the far left we look right wing yeah um and um you know they think anyone who's a
republican is basically like some fascist nazi situation but what's so crazy is like it's very
easy to demonstrate just from like hillary's speeches from 2008 and obama's speeches like when they were talking about immigration like they were as far right as steve bannon when it comes to immigration yes um hillary was like very mega have you i'm sure you've seen that campaign speech which she was talking about if anybody's committed a crime get rid of them and if you're here you pay a hefty fine and you have to wait in line it was really crazy it's crazy to listen to because it's
like it's as mega as you know as marjorie taylor green yeah i mean if you've seen these videos people
post online where they'll take like um a speech from obama or hillary and and and they'll interview people on on like college campus or something and say what do you think of the speech by trump and they're like oh i hate it he's a racist bigot i'm like just kidding that was obama
no actually that was obama or hillary um to your point like literally the the the
um the center's been moved so far yeah yeah the left is so the left has gone so far left that they they they they need you know they can't even see the center with a telescope and the danger with
without you purchasing twitter was that was going to swipe over the whole country and change where the levels were yeah and so what would be rational and and normal would be far left of what was rational
and normal just a decade earlier yeah so exactly so historically um you'd have san francisco berkeley being you know very far left but the the sort of the the fallout from the somewhat nihilistic uh philosophy of san francisco berkeley would be limited in geography to maybe like you know 10 mile radius 20 mile radius something like that um but when um but san francisco and berkeley have to be
co-located with silicon valley with with with uh engineers who created information super weapons and those information super weapons uh were then hijacked by the far left activists to pump far left propaganda to everywhere on earth like i just you remember that like old rca radio tower thing where it's like radio tower on earth and it's just broadcasting yeah that's that's what happened is that the isn't an extremist far left ideology happened to be co-located with the smartest
it where the smartest engineers in the world um were who created information super weapons that were not intended for this purpose but were hijacked by the uh extreme activists who lived in the neighborhood that's what happened that they they hijacked the the modern equivalent of the rca radio tower and broadcast that philosophy everywhere on earth yeah and you see the consequences um particularly in
places that don't have free speech yeah right like england you know we've yeah where they lock people up for memes and stuff literally literally yeah 12 000 people this year 12 000 12 000 12 000 arrests for
social media posts i mean yeah some of these some of these things you read about it and it's like literally it's someone had a meme on their phone that they didn't even send to anyone right
and they got they and and they're like in prison for that yeah um and there was a case in germany where a woman got a longer sentence than the guy that raped her uh because of something she said on a group chat
was it an immigrant who raped her yes yeah it was his culture yeah he didn't know he didn't know
better yes i think i think she said something um you know not not like was critical of his culture and uh and and and she got a longer sentence than the guy who raped her well in germany just
the uk europe germany england thing seems so insane it is totally insane i actually didn't realize it was like such a huge number of people that got 12 000 yeah far above russia far above china right far above anywhere on earth uk is number one well you know things like i could i actually you
know i i i talked to friends of mine in in in england and um i was like hey um aren't you worried about this like uh you know shouldn't you be protesting more um and i mean the problem is that like the you know the the the legacy mainstream media doesn't cover the stuff they're they're like oh everything's fine everything's fine right most people aren't even aware of it until they come knocking on your door yeah until like so i mean the the these these like lovely sort of small towns in
in in you know in england scotland ireland you know they're they've been like sort of living their lives quietly they're they're like hobbits frankly so it's in fact jr r tolkien based the hobbits on people he knew uh in small town england because they were just like lovely people who like to you know smoke their pipe and and have uh nice meals and everything's pleasant um the the hobbits in the
shire the shire he's talking about you know places like hartfordshire like the shire is around in in in the greater london area oxfordshire type of thing um and um they've they've but they're the reason they've been able to enjoy the shire is because hard men have protected them from the dangers of the world and um but but since they have no or very really almost no no exposure to the
the dangers of the world they don't realize that they're there until one day you know um a thousand people show up in your village of 500 out of nowhere and rape and and start raping the kids this has not happened god knows how many times in in britain and the crazy thing it's right like there's some 10 year old got raped in ireland like last week yeah there's literal they snatch some kid
yeah yeah and if you criticize it you can get arrested and that's where it gets insane it's
like how are they not literally criticize it uh like the i think it's the prime minister of ireland actually you know posted on x uh because because after that um some i think some illegal migrant snatched a 10 year old girl uh who was like going to school or something and it violently raped a 10 year old girl um uh and there was a you know the people were very upset about this uh and they protested um the prime minister of ireland instead of saying yeah we really shouldn't be importing
violent rapists into our country uh he criticized the protesters instead and didn't mention that that the reason they were protesting was because a 10 year old girl from their small town got raped
so here's the question why are they supporting this kind of mass immigration and what like is this is there a plan involved in all this is just is this incompetence is this ignoring the fact that they don't have a handle on it so they're trying to silence dissent like what is happening um
because if you want to destroy civilization if you want to destroy western civilization
which joe soros seems to want to do um and you know there's just so the the uh there's there's a guy i think who i don't know if he's been on your show you know god sod yeah has he been on the show
good friend of mine yeah he's great he's been on multiple times oh great that's all he's awesome
yeah so uh you know the way he's he's got a good good uh way to describe it which is suicidal empathy yes so um is is that you prey upon people's empathy you say like well like you feel sorry for for for something for some group and then like well um and and that that that empathy is to such a degree that it is suicidal to to to your country or culture um and um and and that's that that's
suicidal empathy because i don't think we should we should have empathy but but but we should have we should that empathy should should extend to the victims not not not just the criminals we should have empathy for the people that they prey upon um but that's who's how empathy is also responsible for for for why somebody's you know arrested 47 times for for violent offenses gets released and then goes and uh murder somebody um in the u.s that that that's you see you see that same phenomenon
phenomenon playing out everywhere uh where the the suicidal empathy is to such a degree that we're actually allowing um our women to get raped and our children to get killed but it just
doesn't seem like that would be anything that any rational society would go along with that's what makes me so confused it's like you're importing massive numbers of people that come from some really dark places of the world well there's no vetting is the issue it's like right it's like if
like um there's if if there's no vetting like people are just coming through like well what's to stop someone who just committed murder in some other country from um coming to to the united states or coming to to to britain um and just continuing their career of of rape and murder like you unless you've done if there's some due diligence to say like well who who is this person what's their track record if if you if you haven't confirmed that they have a track record of being
uh you know uh honest and uh not being a homicidal maniac then any homicidal maniac can just come across the border and let's not say everyone who comes across the border is a homicidal maniac but if you're not have if you don't have a vetting process to confirm that you're not letting in um people who who will do some serious violence you will get people who do serious violence uh sometimes coming through well especially if you don't punish them and if you don't deport them
and if you are just like well but what is the purpose of allowing all those people into the country it can't be i wouldn't imagine that anyone in their society supports this well let me explain so so so
because you mentioned for example how much say hillary and obama have changed their tune um from prior speeches where they were hot they were hard-nosed about not letting in uh anyone who is a criminal into the country um you know having secure borders all that stuff so why did they change their tune the reason is that they discovered that those people vote for them
that's why they want the open borders because if you let people in they know the democrats let them in they'll vote for democrats yes if you allow them to vote which which they're actively trying to do it they turn a blind eye to illegal voting well california literally doesn't allow you to show your
license california and new york have made it illegal to show your photo id when voting thus effectively they've made uh it impossible to prove fraud impossible they've essentially legalized fraudulent voting in california and new york and many other parts of the country there's no rational explanation
that i've ever seen anyone give as to why that would be the policy unless you were trying to just allow people to vote illegally because there's no other reason if you need a driver's license or you need an id for everything else including just recently to prove that you were vaccinated
the same people who are demanding that you have that you have a vaccine passport and and are the same ones saying you need no id to vote same people right but like so it's obviously hypocritical and inconsistent so you really think it's just to get more voters if you want to understand behavior you have to look at the incentives um so uh once uh you know the democratic party in the u.s and the left in
in in europe realized that um if you have open borders um and you provide a ton of government handouts which creates a massive financial incentive uh for people from other countries to to come to to your country and you don't prosecute them for crime they're going to be beholden to you and they will vote for you and that's why uh obama and hillary went from being um against open borders to being in favor of open
borders that's the reason in order to import voters so they can win elections um and the problem is that that has a a negative runaway effect so if they get away with that like it it is it is a winning strategy if they are allowed to get away with it they will import as many enough voters to get super majority voting and then there is no turning back we talked about this before the election and
then you know you literally pointed towards the camera you faced the camera and said that if you do not vote now you might not ever be able to do it again because it will be it'll be futile it'll be overrun yes they'll keep the borders open for another four years and their objective will be
achieved correct if if if trump had lost um there would never have been another real election again
um because trump is actually enforcing the border um now you can you know you can you point to situations where uh there's been uh you know uh you know immigration had you know enforcement has been overzealous because they're not going to be perfect there'll be cases where they've been overzealous um in in expelling illegals um so um but if you say that the the standard must be perfection uh for expelling illegals then you will not get any expulsion um because perfection is
impossible um so and you've probably got millions of people that are here that are trying to be here under some asylum pretense right yes like you could just come from a war-torn part of the world
no they they changed the definition of asylum to be an economic to be economic asylum which is everybody which is everybody yeah so it's the lowest bar to prove it's yeah it's asylum is supposed to mean that if you go back to your country you'll get killed you know that that's what we mean by so that was what it's supposed to mean uh they changed the definition of asylum to be uh you will have a decreased standard of living which is obviously not real asylum um and and it's and
and you can you can test the absurdity of this by the fact that people who are asylum seekers go on vacation to the country that they're seeking asylum from you know that doesn't make any sense yeah it doesn't have to yeah but when you when you understand the incentives then then you understand the behavior um so once the left realized that uh that illegals will will vote for them if they allow if they have open borders and and combine that with uh with govern handouts yeah to create a massive
incentive that they're basically uh using u.s and and europe u.s and european taxpayer dollars to provide a financial incentive to bring in as many illegals as possible to vote them into a into permanent power into and create a one-party state and i invite anyone who's listening to this just do do any research and the more you the more you dig into it the more it will become obvious
that what i'm saying is absolutely true well they were busing people to swing states it's it's clear that they were trying to do something and then you had chuck schumer and nancy pelosi who are actively talking about the need to bring in people to make them citizens because we're in population collapse
yes yeah no that's it's it's that it's that meme yeah where so many times where they start off by saying it's it's not true it's a right-wing conspiracy theorist right um then it starts then it's like uh i think the next step is um well it it might be true and then it's like okay it is true but here's why and then the final step is it's true and here's why it's good yeah and it's like but wait a second you started off saying it's untrue and it's right-wing conspiracy theorist now you're saying
it not only is it true but it's a good thing and we must do more of it well this is the thing about
medicaid and social security and people getting social security numbers you know that it's massive fraud it's massive fraud and it's real and they denied it forever and now we're finding out this is part of the reason why this is government shutdown that's going on right now yes the the entire basis
for the government shutdown is that um is that the trump administration correctly does not want to send massive amounts of like hundreds of billions of dollars uh to fund uh illegal immigrants in the blue states or in all the states really um and so the and democrats want to keep the the money spigot going to incent uh illegal immigrants to come into the u.s who will vote for them that's the crux of the
battle so they want to stop this so what's going on right now is they have been funding these people they've been giving them ebt cards they've been giving them medicaid and they've been even housing
more than that just like like like they were how the um like they were taking hotels like four and five star hotels like the roosevelt hotel being the classic example um was they were sending i think sixty million dollars a year to the roosevelt hotel to uh which all it did was was house illegals it used to be a nice hotel i mean it still is a nice hotel um uh but uh and and there are all around the country this was happening and all tax dollars yes yeah and um yeah and uh the trump administration
cutoff funding for example to to the uh uh to the you know roosevelt hotel and these other hotels saying like we it's it's u.s tax dollars should not be paid be sent to have luxury hotels for illegal immigrants that american citizens can't even afford which obviously is the case that that's that's insane that's what was happening they were also giving out like debit cards with ten thousand dollars so it's not just about medical care um the the the the democrats mentioned medical care
because they're trying to prey on people's empathy as much as possible and then they imagine oh wow somebody has a desperately needed medical procedure and um shouldn't we maybe do you know take care of them in that regard but but they what they do is they divert the medicaid funds uh uh and turn it into a slush fund for the for the states that goes well beyond uh emergency medical care and new york and california would be bankrupt without uh without the massive fraudulent federal payments that go to
those states to pay for illegals to to to create a massive financial incentive for for illegals how would they be bankrupt because of that uh they wouldn't be able to balance their state budgets and they can't issue currency like the federal reserve can and so that their ability to balance budget is
dependent upon illegals getting funding
the the the scam level here is is so staggering um so there are there are hundreds of billions of dollars of of transfer payments from from the federal government to the states um those transfer payments uh the the states self-report what those transfer payment numbers should be so california and new york and illinois lie like crazy uh and say and and say that this these are
all legitimate payments well these days that i think they've they're even admitting that they they literally want uh hundreds of billions of dollars for illegals um but uh but for a while they're they're trying to deny it um so you get these transfer payments for for every every government program you can possibly think of um and and and these are self-reported by the state and and and and at least historically there was no enforcement of uh of california um new york illinois and and and and other states when when they would lie there was no actual enforcement to
say like hey you you're lying these these these payments are fraudulent now under the trump administration um that the trump administration does not want to send hundreds of billions of fraud fraudulent payments to the states but um and the reason you have this the standoff is because if the hundreds hundreds of billions of dollars uh to to create a financial incentive to like to have this giant magnet to attract illegals from every part of earth to uh to these states if that
is turned off they the the illegals will leave because they're no longer being paid to come to the united states and stay here wow and then then then they will lose a lot of voters the the democratic party
will lose a lot of voters and they would have a very difficult job if this is kicked out of reintroducing it into a new bill yes especially once things start normalizing yes so like in a nutshell
um the democratic party wants to destroy democracy by importing voters and the you know the republican
party disagrees with and the ruse is that if you don't accept what they're doing then you're a threat to democracy yes as they try to destroy democracy yes by importing voters that is literally what they're doing people to only vote for them and overwhelming the system yes and by the way it's
a strategy that if allowed to work would work and in fact has worked um california is super majority a democrat yeah um and there's so much gerrymandering that that that occurs it's it's it's crazy um so
i'm sure you're paying attention to this proposition 50 thing i know that that's the thing in california where they're trying to re redo districts oh yeah yeah because i mean california's already gerrymandered
like crazy yeah um they want to gerrymander it even more um and and i mean because it keeps moving
further and further right like if you look at the map of california each voting cycle more and more people are waking up and going what the fuck and we need to do something to fix this the only option available other than the policies that you guys have always done is go right and so a lot of people
have been air air quotes red pilled yeah and and then here's another thing that is very important um fact that that is actually not disputed by by either side which is that when we do the census in the united states the census the way the census works uh for apportionment of congressional seats and um electoral electoral college votes for the president is by a number of persons in a state not number of citizens right it's number of people so you could literally be a tourist and you will count now how do they do
the census when they do that do they is it do they ask people do they knock on doors do they have
them fill out forms like what yeah i think they mail out census forms and knock on doors um but the way the law reads right now um and and uh is that all if you are a human with a pulse um uh then you count in the census for allocating congressional seats and presidential votes right so uh you so electoral college everything it doesn't matter whether you're here legally illegally and if you're a human
with a pulse um you count for congressional apportionment so that means that uh the more people the more illegals that california and new york can can import what went by the time the census happens in 2030 um the more congressional seats they will have um and the more electoral the more presidential electoral college votes they will have um so they're trying to get as many uh illegals in as possible ahead of the census um and because all all human beings even tourists count for the census
and and then if you combine that with gerrymandering of of districts in new york and california let's point out with this proposition whether they're trying to increase the amount of gerrymandering that occurs in california the biggest state in the country um so so you get so so if the this if the census then would award more congressional seats to california uh because of a vast number of illegals and new york and illinois um so they'll get more congressional seats they'll get more
presidential electoral college votes getting that would get them the house the uh majority in the house and and and they would get to decide who is president uh based literally based on legals this isn't these are not disputed facts by either party i want to emphasize that that sink in yeah this is not a these are not disputed facts by either party it's not a this these are just this is just the the way the law works it's it is uh you know like i don't think the law should work that way
uh i think it should the apportionment should be proportionate to to to citizens but isn't that a
problem with how the constitution is written yeah yeah yeah um they can't really change that i'm not
sure if it's constitutional or uh but it it it is the way the law is written i'm not sure if it's in the constitution or not in this way but um but it is that is the way the law is written so it is an
incentive and but it's an incentive that would be removed with something simple that makes sense to everybody that only the people that should count are people that are official u.s citizens
yes the way the way it should work is that only u.s citizens uh should count in the census uh for purposes of of determining voting power because people that aren't legal can't vote supposedly they're not supposed to be voting um but but they do um uh but but even even if even besides that like i i i just can't emphasize this enough because this is a very important concept for people to understand um is that the law um the law as it stands um counts all humans with a pulse in in in a state
for deciding how many uh house representative votes and how many presidential electoral college votes uh as a state gets so the incentive therefore is uh to uh for california york illinois to maximize the number of illegals so they get so they get um so that they take house seats away from red states assign them to california new york illinois and so forth um then then you combine that with extreme gerrymandering in in california new york illinois and whatnot so that that basically you can't even
elect any republicans and then they get control of the presidency control of the house then they keep doing that strategy um and and cement a super majority that is what they're trying to do
so that would essentially turn the entire country into california yes well you have differing opinions but it doesn't matter because one party is always in control yes when you first started digging into this when you first started before you even accepted this role of running doge and being a part of all that did you have any idea that it was this fucked up um i i did yeah i mean i sort of
when did you start knowing um i guess about like well about two years ago um isn't that crazy and like relatively recently you know yeah maybe i started i started having well i started at like basically having a bad feeling about three years ago which is why which was which is when uh why i felt it was like critical to acquire twitter um and have a maximally truth-seeking platform not one that suppresses the truth um and um like it was more it was more like i i'm like i'm not sure
what's going on but i have a i have a bad feeling about what's going on and then the more i dug into it the the more i was like holy shit we got a real problem here and america's gonna fall
so without anyone knowing it had fallen that's that would be the problem it could have fallen and been unrepairable without anyone really being aware yeah of what had happened especially if you didn't buy
twitter yes that's that's it's like buying twitter was a huge pain in the ass um and made me a a a pincushion of attacks like dab dab dab dab dab everybody loved you before that well some people
a lot of people loved you a lot of lefties loved you uh i i was a hero of the left it was a thing if you drove a tesla it showed that you were environmentally conscious yes and you were on the right side
uh yeah um yeah i mean i'm still the same human i didn't like have a brain transplant between you know since in like three years ago you know um well that's my favorite bumper sticker that people
put on teslas now i bought this before elon went crazy i took a picture of one the other day oh you found this oh yeah i've seen i've seen three or four of them people that have these bumper stickers on their car that says i bought this before elon went crazy because when people were yeah teslas
yeah the most organized campaign to literally burn down teslas and and we had one of our dealerships got shot up with a gun like they fired bullets into the tesla dealership they're burning down cars uh it was crazy um uh so but the bumper sticker should read there should be an addendum to the bumper sticker it's like i bought this car before uh elon turned crazy actually now i realize he's not crazy and i've seen the light that'll take some time that'll take some time people don't want to
admit that they've been tricked yeah i mean they don't like that old saying where it's like it's really easy to fool somebody but it's almost impossible to convince someone that they were fooled yeah
it's much easier to fool them than to convince them they've been fooled people cling to their ideas yes they especially if they've like publicly stated these things they get very embarrassed to being
foolish yeah people most time they double down um and uh and they find echo chambers yeah yeah but there's you know the thing is that like i've you know i've seen more and more people who were convinced of the sort of woke ideology um see the light yeah so not everyone but it's more and more um are seeing the light um and and it tends to happen like when when something happens that really you know directly affects you right um you know like there was a friend of mine who uh was living in in the san francisco
bay area and um that tried to trans his his daughter um did like to the point where the the school like sent sent the police to his house to take his daughter away from him now now that's going to radicalize you well that's going to break that's going to shake you out of your blue structure
um now i know it was an activist at the school yeah i was trying to do this yeah the school and
this and the state of california conspired to turn his daughter against him and uh make her take uh life-altering drugs that would have sterilized her um and uh irreversible and how old was she i think 14 something like that um so and he managed to talk the police out of taking his daughter away from him that day um and that that night he got on a plane to texas wow um and uh like you know a year
later after just being in in a school in like greater austin area um she she went she came went back to
normal meaning like it wasn't real right um well people are being much more open to that now i mean wall street journal uh yesterday had that opinion piece that this whole trans thing there's a lot of evidence is a social contagion absolutely and colin wright wrote that and then he's getting death threats now of course and on blue sky there's people talking about exterminating him which is one thing that you are allowed to say on blue sky apparently you're you're allowed to say horrible things about
people say possibly truthful things about this whole social contagion because that's what when you get nine kids that are in a friend group and they all decide to turn trans together yeah something's wrong that's not statistically yeah like here's feasible like you can convince kids to do anything you can convince kids to be a suicide bomber right so which is why they do with in in some countries why they
choose children to do that yes yeah you can train kids to be suicide bombers and if you can train kids to be suicide bombers you can convince them of anything yeah especially with enough positive enforcement
and cultural enforcement and you and the idea that that that's not the case the kids kids are kids
are um malleable yes the minds of youth are easily corrupted you're also seeing a lot of pushback from
gay and lesbian people that are saying like hey if someone so stop including me so yeah exactly
yeah the lgbtq you know it's like wait a second why are we being included all the time in this
situation exactly exactly when especially when you know like my friend tim dylan's talked about this is like it's really homophobic because you're taking these gay kids and you're you're telling them like hey you're not gay you're actually a girl yes and you know hey go make it so that you can never have an orgasm again and you'll be happy like yeah it's fucking like permanent mutilation
permanent castration of kids is like i i think i i we should look at at uh anyone who permanently castrates a kid as like right up there with joseph mengler yeah i mean they're they're mutilating
children yeah yeah and um it's thought of as being kind and the thing is would you rather have a live daughter or a dead son that's that's the that's the line they use yeah which is not supported by
any data no it's all the probability of suicide increases right this is important maybe for the audience to know uh the probability of suicide increases if you trans a kid not decreases by some accounts it triples so that that is an evil lie and it's a lie that is supposedly compassionate
imagine you've twisted reality to the point where confusing a child that's not even legally allowed to get a fucking tattoo yeah right because you think that you could make a mistake with a tattoo a totally removable thing right if i wanted to tomorrow i can go to a doctor and they could laser off every tattoo that i have on me right okay no harm no foul yeah but you get sterilized like that's it forever forever yes though castrate you you no longer have testicles yes that's not coming back
you have a hole where your penis used to be yes and this is compassionate and this is preventing
you actually a lot of kids die uh in in with these uh sex change operations they die the number of deaths on the operating table people don't hear about this a lot of kids because that it's we don't really actually have the technology to make this work so a bunch of times the kids just die in the sex change operations jesus christ yeah it's it's demented which it should be viewed as like you know um like like evil nazi doctor stuff that's why it was like real nazi not the bullshit fake
nazi stuff crazy that even pushing back against something that seems like fundamentally logically very easy to argue the old twitter would ban you forever uh yes that's how crazy a social contagion can get when it completely defies logic victimizes children yeah does something that makes no sense does not supported by data all connected to this ideology that trans is good we got to save
trans kids protect trans kids yeah and what i want to emphasize is that the the save trans kids thing is a lie um if you if you if you if you castrate kids and trans them the probability of suicide increases it does not decrease it substantially increases um the the the the studies have done that i've seen the risk of suicide triples if you trans kids so you're not saving them you're killing them moreover during the sex change operation there are many deaths that occur during the sex change
operation jesus christ it's just crazy that this is a real issue yeah it's a nightmare fever dream and people are finally waking up from it now when you started getting into the doge stuff and started finding how much money is being shuffled around and moved around to ngos and how much money is involved and just totally untraceable funds like this is again something like two years plus ago
you weren't aware of it all no i was aware of it um i just didn't realize how how the how big it was it was just just just how much waste and food there is in the government is truly vast um in fact the government didn't even know um nor did they care that's crazy yeah and i mean just like some of the very basic stuff that doge did um will have lasting effects um and some of these things are like they're
so elementary you can't believe it so um the the doge team got the um you know the the most of the main payments computers um to require uh the the congressional appropriation code so when a payment is made you have to actually enter the congressional appropriation card that used to be optional and and often would be just left blank so the money would just go out but it wasn't even tied to a congressional appropriation then they also doge team also made the uh comment field for the payment mandatory so you have to say
something we're not saying that what what is said like you can say anything you you your cat could run across the keyboard uh you could go qwerty asdf but you have to say something above nothing because what we found was that there were tens of billions maybe hundreds of billions of dollars that was zombie payments so they're like somebody had approved a payment uh something the governor approved a payment um and uh some recurring payment and um they retired or died or changed jobs and no one turned the money off
so the money would just keep going out and and it's a pretty rare go where to to uh a company or an individual um and it's a pretty rare company or individual who will complain that they're getting money that they should not get and a bunch of money was just going to this were transfer payments to the states so these are automatic payments yeah just automatic payments no accounting for them at all like imagine like it like there's an automatic debit of your credit card
um and you don't you never look at the statement right um so it's just money going out uh because i call them zombie payments um that they might have been they might have been legitimate at one point but the person who approved that recurring payment um changed jobs died retired or whatever and no one ever turned the money off and my guess is that's probably at least a hundred billion dollars a year maybe 200 and going where to to uh uh uh i mean there are millions of these
payments so so it's i mean millions uh yes yes millions of payments that are going to who knows
where yes so in a bunch of cases there are fraud rings that operate uh professional fraud rings that operate to exploit the system um they figure out some security hole in the system and they just do
professional fraud um and um you know that's where we found for example people who were you know 300 years old in the social security administration database now i thought that this
was a mistake of not registering their deaths that people were born like a long time ago and it had defaulted to like a certain number and so that after time those people were still in the system it was
just an error of the the way the accounting was done yeah so um that's not true so there's or at least one of two things must be true um the there's a there's a typo or or some mistake in the computer or it's fraudulent but we don't have any 300 year old vampires uh living in america allegedly allegedly um and uh or and we don't have people in some cases who's who are receiving payments who are
born in the future born in the future born in the future really yes there were the people receiving payments whose birth date uh um was like in 2100 and something okay so there's like next century is there a task force we know we know that one of two things must be true um that that that that either there's a mistake in the computer or it's fraud but if you have someone's birthday that's either in the future or where they are older than the oldest living american because the oldest living
american is 114 years old so if they're more than 114 years old um there is either a mistake and someone should should call them and say i i think we have your birthday uh wrong because it says you born in 17 you know 80 86 um and um you know that was before you know um you know before there was really an america you know it was uh it was like uh you know that's a kind of early you know we're still fighting england type of thing uh you know it's like uh this person either needs to be in the
guinness book of world records or or they're not alive but still at the end of the day money is
going towards that account that's connected to this person that is either non-existent yeah or
so like like yeah so there was like uh i think um something like i don't know 20 million uh people in the social security administration database that could not possibly be alive um if their birth date is like based on their birth date they could not possibly be alive and then to be clear 20 million people that were receiving funds uh a bunch of most of them were not receiving funds some of them were receiving funds most were not receiving funds but so let me tell you how the scam works it's it's a
bank shot so the social security administration database is used as the source of truth by all the other databases that the government uses so even if they stop the payments on the social security administration database like unemployment insurance small business administration student loans all check the social security administration database to say is this is this a legitimate alive person and uh and if the social security database will say yes this person is still alive even though they're 200 years old um but forget to mention that they're 200 years old it just says
it just returns uh uh uh when when the computer is queries it says yes this person is alive and so then they're able to exploit the entire rest of the government ecosystem so fake then you get fake student loans then you get fake unemployment insurance then you get like fake medical payments
and this doesn't have to be tied to an individual where where there's an address where you can check
on this person no if you did if you just did any check at all you would stop this so so so that's that that that that's so so and how much money do you think is any check it like anything at all the the the that would start would stop the forward like any effort at all um yeah so there's multiple
layers yes social security number verifies that this is a real person right and then the other
systems check up on every other government payment and every other government payment system for everything for like small small business administration uh student loans uh medicaid medicare uh every other government payment of which there are many there are actually hundreds of government payment systems uh can all be exploited so long as social security database says this person is alive
that's the nature of the scam it's a bank shot so then the then the rebuttal from the dems is like oh well the vast majority of the people who are marked as alive in the social security administration weren't receiving social security administration payments that is true what they forgot to mention is they're getting fraudulent payments from every other government program and that's why the the the dems were so opposed to turning off to declaring someone dead who was dead because it would stop the entire other all the other fraud from happening and so but all this is it trackable
like all this other fraud if they wanted to they could chase it all down yeah it's not even hard
and yet they're opposing check chasing it all down they're opposing chasing it all down because it
turns off the money magnet for the illegals wow because it's very logical to like like i'm saying the most common sense things possible if someone's got uh a birthday in social security that is an impossible birthday meaning they are older than the oldest living american or born in the future then you should call them and say excuse me we seem to have your birthday wrong
uh because it says that you're 200 years old that's all you need to do um and then you would
remove them from the social security database and make that number no longer available for all those other government payments exactly wow and how much money are we talking it's a hundred hundreds of billions of dollars and this is all traceable like you could hunt all this down like you don't need
to be sherlock holmes here that's what i'm saying well this is we don't need to call sherlock holmes for this one is this part of just need to call the person is this and and say excuse me we that we seem to have like we we must have your birthday wrong because it says you're 200 years old or born uh in the future um so could you tell us what your birthday is that's what you need to do it's that simple
but the all these other government payments that are available that are connected to this social security number it seems like if you just chased that all down yeah you would find the widespread
fraud you would find where it's going yes but the root of the problem is the social security right administration database because um the social security number in the united states is used as a de facto national id number you know that's why like the bank always asks for your social right so like you know any financial institution will ask for your social security number this is it
sounds so insane that this isn't chased down i mean like yeah i agree that i mean that in and of itself
is that's such mishandling yes that's why it's mind-blowing um so yeah it's crazy well you were very
reluctant last time you were here to talk about the extent of some of the fraud because you're like
they could kill me because this is kind of oh what yeah what i'm saying is that um the like if you create if like uh i like like to be pragmatic and realistic um you actually can't manage to zero fraud yet you can manage to low fraud number but not to zero fraud if you manage to zero fraud um you you're going to push so many people over the edge who are receiving fraudulent payments that the number of
inbound homicidal maniacs will be uh really hard to overcome so i'm i'm actually taking i think quite a reasonable position which is that we should simply reduce the amount of fraud which i think is not an extremist position um and we should aspire to you know have less fraud over time um not that we should be ultra draconian and eliminate every last scrap of fraud um which i guess would be nice to have
but but like we don't even need to go that extreme i'm saying we should just stop the blatant large scale super obvious fraud i think that's a reasonable position it's a very reasonable position
yeah and so what was the most shocking pushback that you got when you started implementing doge when
you started investigating into where money was going well um i guess that this is i should have anticipated this but um while most of the fraudulent government payments to especially to the ngos go to the democrats most of it like i don't know for argument's sake let's say 80 percent not maybe 90 90 percent um um 10 to 20 percent of it does go to republicans and so when we turn off funding to a
fraudulent ngos we'd get complaints from whatever the 10 percent of republicans who are receiving uh the money and and they would you know they would very loudly complain um because they're the the honest answer is the republicans are are partly they're receiving some of the fraud too they're getting a big jesus yeah it's i want to be clear it's it's not like the republican party is some um ultra pure
paragon of virtue no okay um well you see that with the congressional insider training it's across the
board yeah it's left and right i mean the whole uni party criticism has some validity to it you know there's so um and it's it's like if you turn off fraudulent payments it's not like like this it's not like 100 of those payments were going to democrats as a a small percentage were also going to republicans those republicans complained very loudly um and um you know and and that's that's
so there was a lot of pushback on the republican side when we started cutting some of these funds these funds and i tried telling them like well you know 90 of the money is going to your opponents but they still if they still even if they're getting 10 they want their peace yeah they want their peace and they've been getting that peace for a long time yes did you this is why like you know politics is like it's dirty business yeah i mean that's like saying if like you know if if you
if you like sausages and respect the law do not watch either of them being being made
yeah yeah yeah wow well that's not even true because i've made sausage yeah yeah it's actually yeah it's like it's not that big a deal yeah fat and spices and casing running through the machine
not that big a deal yeah um but uh yeah i mean i i think the stuff i'm saying here is not uh like like if you stand back and think about it for a second like oh yeah that that that makes sense you know um the it's it's not like um it's not like one political party is going to be um you know pure devil or pure angel there's you know i think there's there's there's there's much more corruption on the democrat side but it's not there's not there's still some corruption on the
republican side how did it happen that the majority of the corruption wound up being on the democrat
side well because the the the transfer payments especially to illegals um uh are very much on the democrat side so that's the root of it all is the illegal situation yes i mean this or a focal point yes it's it's also like it's it's um it's it would also be accurate so that while
obviously not everyone who's a democrat is a criminal almost everyone who is a criminal is a democrat
because because the democrats are the soft on crime party so if you're a criminal who are you going to
vote for right right the soft on crime party did you think you were going to be able to get more done
than you were um we did get a lot done right um and doge is still still still happening by the way um that this the doge is still underway there are still there are still um there's still wasting forward being being cut by by the doge team so it hasn't stopped um it's less publicized it's less publicized um and they don't have like a clear person to attack anymore well it seems like once you stepped away they're basically they they applied immense pressure to me to just to stop it so then
i'm like the best thing for me is to just you know cut out of this and in any case as a special government employee i could only be there for like 120 days anyway something like that so whatever the law says so i could i i was necessarily could only be there for four months uh as a special government employee so um um but uh yeah i mean i mean you turn off the money spigot to to fraudsters they get very upset to say the least um and um but my like my death threat level went uh ballistic you know
was like a like a rocket going to orbit um yeah um so but now that not now that i'm not in dc that that i guess they don't really have a person to attack uh anymore um well the rhetoric about you
has calmed down significantly yeah it was disturbing it was disturbing to watch it was like this is crazy and to watch these politicians engage in it and all these people just like framing you as this monster i was like this is so weird like this is what happens when you uncover fraud yes the whole machine turns on you and if it wasn't for a person like you who owns a platform and has an enormous amount of money like it could have destroyed you yeah and that was the goal the goal was to destroy
me absolutely because you were getting in the way yeah this amazing graft the the this gigantic fraud machine yeah um like i said i think we i think doge teams on done a lot of good work um you know in in terms of uh fraud and waste prevented my guess is it's you know probably on the order of two or 300 billion a year so it's pretty good what do you think could have been done if you just had like
full reign and total cooperation how much do you think you could have saved i mean what level of
power are we assuming here godlike oh yeah probably cut the federal budget in half
and get more done that is so crazy it is so crazy get more done and federal budget spread it's that
widespread well i mean a whole bunch of government departments simply shouldn't exist in my opinion um they they um you know um like examples well the department of education which was created recently like under uh jimmy carter um uh the our educational results have uh gone uh downhill ever since it was created so if you if you create a department and the result of creating that department is a massive decline in educational results and it's the problem of education you're better off
not having it because we're literally we're we did better before there was one than after when you let the states run it yes yeah because at least the states can compete with one another um so but the problem is like you hear like cutting department education our kids need education like yeah they do but but this is a new department that didn't even exist um you know until late the late 70s um and ever since that department was created the results educational results have declined
and so why would you have an institution continue that has made education worse it doesn't make sense they killed it though right no they still unfortunately but they were trying to kill it
it has been substantially reduced okay um what other organizations what other departments well
i mean i'm a small government guy so um you know when when the you know when the country was created we just we just had the department of state department of war um you know and and uh sort of the sort of the department of justice we had an attorney general uh and uh treasury department
um i don't know why you need more than that so what other departments specifically do you think
are just completely ineffective well i mean here it's like a question it's a sort of philosophical question of how much government do you think there should be right um in my opinion there should
be uh the least amount of government i've heard the most bizarre argument against this is that you're cutting jobs and you're going to leave people jobless i'm like but their jobs are useless
uh yeah paying people to do nothing doesn't make sense right um like there's a like a great um i it's a story about like milton friedman who is awesome um uh what like generally whatever milton friedman said is you know people should should do that thing uh i'm not sure if it's apocryphal or not but um it's like like someone complained to him like he observed i think people that were like um digging ditches with uh you know with with uh shovels and um and he said well like allegedly
the freedom said well i think i think you should use you know um excavating equipment instead of shovels and you could get it done with far fewer people and then and then someone said but then we're going to lose a lot of jobs well in that is then freedom says well in that case why don't you have them use teaspoons just dig ditches with teaspoons think of all the jobs you'll create i mean it's bullshit basically you just want people to work on on things that are that are
productive you want people to work on on building things um on building you know uh providing products and services that people find valuable um like you know making food um being you know being a farmer or a plumber or electrician or just anyone who's a builder or providing useful services um and um that's what you want people to be doing um not fake government jobs uh that that that don't add any value or may subtract value um um but it's also like you know uh to illustrate the absurdity
of also how is the how is the economy measured like the the way uh economists measure the economy is is is nonsensical uh because they'll measure any job no matter even if that job is a dumb job that has no point and is even counterproductive so like so like like the joke is like there's two economists going on a hike in the woods they come across a pile of shit and one economist says the other i'll pay you a hundred dollars to eat eat that shit the economist eats the shit gets the
hundred dollars they can they keep walking then the other economy then they come across another pile of shit and and the the other economist says now i'll pay you a hundred dollars to eat the pile of shit so he pays the so he pays the other economist a hundred dollars to pile a pile of shit then that then then then the way said they said look wait a second um we both just ate a pile of shit and we're no and and and and we're we're no we we we we we we don't have any more extra money like like we both you just gave the hundred dollars back to me and we both ate a pile of shit this doesn't make
any sense and they said no no but think of the economy because that's two hundred dollars of of that in the economy that that that basically they're eating eating shit would count as a as a as a job
this is this is uh this is to illustrate the absurdity of of of of economics one of the things you said
when you stepped away is that you're kind of done and that it's unfixable that um well or under its current form the way people are approaching it you you can you can make it directionally better but
ultimately you can't uh fully fix the system um so uh i i like like like like it like it it is it is it would be accurate to say that even like unless you could go like super draconian like you know genghis khan level on on on cutting waste waste and fraud which you can't really do in a democratic country um an aspirationally democratic country then um there's no way to solve the the debt crisis
so we've got we've got national debt that's just insane where the debt payments the interest payments on the debt exceed our entire military budget i mean that's what that was one of the wake-up calls for me i was like wait a second the interest on our national debt is bigger than the entire the entire the entire military budget um and growing um this is crazy um so um so so even if you implement all these savings you're only delaying the day of reckoning for when america becomes it
goes bankrupt so unless you go full genghis khan um which you can't really do so
so um so i came to the conclusion that the only way that the only way to get us out of the debt crisis and to prevent america from going bankrupt is ai and robotics so like we need to grow the economy um at at a at a rate that allows us to uh to pay off our debt um and um i i i i
guess people just generally don't appreciate the degree to which um you know this the the government overspending is is a problem um but even like the social security website this is under the biden administration on the website i would say like uh we based on on current demographic trends and um and and and and how much money social security is bringing in versus how many social security recipients there are because we have an aging population relatively speaking average age is increasing social security will not be able to make uh maintain its full payments uh i think in
by 2032 there's a little social security will have to stop or start reducing the the amount of money that that's been paid people um in in about seven years and so the only way to fix that robotics manufacturing raise gdp you've got to basically uh massively increase the um uh economic output which is and the only way to do that is ai and ai and robotics so so basically we're going bankrupt without ai and robotics was even with a bunch of savings um the savings the savings like reducing
uh waste and forward can give us a longer runway but it cannot ultimately pay off our national debt
so what do you think the solution is to the jobs that are going to be lost because of ai and robotics the jobs due to automation the jobs due to no longer do we need human beings to do these jobs because ai is doing them do you think it's going to be some sort of a universal basic income thing do you think there's going to be some other kind of solution that has to be implemented because a lot
of people are going to be out of work right um i think there will be um actually a high demand for jobs but not necessarily the same jobs so i mean this this is actually this process has been happening um throughout um modern history um i mean they used to be the like like doing calculations um manually with with like pencil and paper it used to be a job so they used to have like buildings full of people called computers where the the banks would like all you do all day is is um you do
calculations because they didn't have computers they didn't have digital didn't have digital computers that that people do yeah well they're just people just like add and subtract stuff on piece of paper and and and that that would be how banks would do you know financial processing and you'd have to
literally go over their equations to make sure the books are balanced yeah and most times it's just
simple math like you know the like in a world before computers how did you calculate how did you do transactions you had to do them by hand um so then when computers were introduced the job of doing um you know bank calculations no longer existed um so people had to go do something else um and that's what's going to happen that what that's what is happening at an accelerated rate um due to ai and and
then robotics that's the issue though right the accelerated rate because it's going to be it's
the accelerator it's it's it's just happening like i said like ai is the supersonic tsunami
so that's what i call it supersonic tsunami um so it's like what other jobs will be available that aren't available now because of ai um well ai um will is is really still digital ultimately um ai can improve the productivity of of humans who who um build things with their hands or do things with their hands like plum you know literally uh welding electrical work plumbing anything that's that's
physically moving atoms um like say like cooking food or um you know farming or like like anything that's that's physical uh those jobs will exist for a much longer time but anything that is digital uh which is like just someone at a computer doing something ai is going to take over those jobs like
lightning coding anything along those lines yeah it's going to take over those jobs like lightning
um just like it just like digital computers took over the job of people doing manual calculations
but but much faster so what happens to all those people like what kind of numbers are we talking about you're going to lose most drivers right commercial drivers you're going to have automated vehicles ai controlled systems just like uh there's certain ports in china and i think in singapore where everything's completely automated yeah well mostly yeah yeah so you're going to lose a lot of those jobs longshoremen jobs trucking commercial drivers yeah i mean we actually do have a shortage of truck
drivers but there's this actually um well that's why california's hired so many illegals to do it have you seen those numbers yeah um i mean the problem is like when you when people don't know how to drive a semi truck which is actually a hard thing to do then they they crash and kill people yeah um a friend of mine's wife was killed by an uh an illegal driving a truck and she was just out biking um and uh there was an illegal he didn't know how to drive the truck or so or something i mean and he he ran ran her over um so i mean like thing is like for something like you can't you can't let
people drive uh you know sort of an 80 000 pound semi um if they don't know how to do it but in california they're just letting people do it because they need people to do it well they also need they want the votes and that kind of thing but um but but yeah like cars are um cars are going to be autonomous um but there's just so many desk desk jobs where really people what people are doing is they're processing email um or they're answering the phone um and and just anything that is that that
isn't moving atoms like anything that is not physically like doing physical work that will obviously be the first thing those jobs will be and are being eliminated by ai at a very rapid pace um um and ultimately i working will be optional uh because you'll have robots plus ai um and we'll have in a benign scenario universal high income not just universal basic income
universal high income meaning anyone can have any products or services that they want so you but there will be a lot of trauma and disruption along the way so you anticipate a
basic income from that that the economy will boost to such an extent that a high income would be available to almost everybody so we'd essentially eliminate poverty um in the benign scenario yes
so like there's multiple scenarios there are multiple scenarios there's a lot of ways this movie can end um like the reason i'm so concerned about ai safety is that like one of the possibilities is the terminator scenario it's not it's not zero percent um so um that's why it's like i'm like really banging the drum on ai needs to be maximally truth-seeking like don't make i don't force ai to believe a lie like that for example the founding fathers were actually a group of diverse women or
that misgendering is worth a nuclear war because if that's the case and then you get the robots and the ai becomes omnipotent it can enforce that outcome and then then like it unless you're a diverse woman you're you're out of the picture so we're toast so that's or you might wake up as a diverse woman one day the ai has adjusted the picture and and we are now a diverse woman so that
would be that's the the worst possible situation so so what would be the steps that we would have to take in order to implement the benign solution where it's universal high income like best case scenario this is the path forward to universal high income for essentially every single citizen that the the economy gets boosted by ai and robotics to such an extent that no one ever has to work
again and what about meaning for those people which is which gets really weird yeah i don't know how to answer the question about meaning um that's an individual problem right but it's going to be an
individual problem for millions of people yeah well i i mean i i i i guess i've like fought fought against saying like you know i you know i've been i've been voicing like hey we need to slow down ai we need to slow down all these things um and and we need to you know not not have a crazy ai race i've been saying that for a long time for 20 20 plus years um but but then i you know i came to
realize that um really there's two choices here either be a spectator or or a participant and if i'm a if i'm a spectator i can't really influence the direction of ai but if i'm a participant i can try to influence the direction of ai and have a maximally true seeking ai with with good values that uh loves humanity and that's what we're trying to create with grok at xai and um you know the research is i think bearing this out like i said the when they when they compared like how do ai's value the weight of a human life um uh grok was the only one the only one of the ai's
that weighted human life equally um and and didn't and didn't say like a white guy's uh worth one twentieth of a of a black woman's life literally that's what they they kept the calculation they came up with so i'm like this is i'm like guys this is very alarming we should we got to watch this stuff
so this is one of the things that has to happen in order to reach this benign solution
yeah we we i just keep best movie ending yeah um you you want a curious truth-seeking ai um and i think a curious truth-seeking ai will want to foster humanity uh because we're much more interesting than um a bunch of rocks like you say like like i love mars you know uh but but mars is kind of boring like it's just a bunch of red rocks um it's there's some cool stuff it's got a tall
mountain it's got you know it's got the biggest ravine the biggest ravine and the tallest mountain um but there's no there's no there's no animals or plants or and and there's no people um and uh you know so humanity is just much more interesting if you're a curious truth-seeking ai than not humanity it's just much more interesting um i mean like as as humans we could go for example and and and eliminate all chimps if we said if we put our minds to it we could say we could go out
and we could annihilate all chimps and all gorillas but but we don't um there has been encroachment on their environment but we we actually try to preserve uh the the uh the chimp and gorilla habitats um and um and i think in a good scenario uh ai would do the same with with humans it would actually foster uh human civilization and care about human happiness so this is um this is a thing to try to
achieve i think um but what is the what does the landscape look like if you have grok competing with open ai competing with all these different like how does it work like what what what if you have ais that have been captured by ideologies that are side by side competing with grok like how do we so this is one of the reasons why you felt like it's important to not just be a an observer
but participate and then have grok be more successful and more potent than these other applications yes as
long as there's at least one ai that is maximally truth-seeking curious and um you know and for example ways all you know human lives equally um does not favor one race or gender then um then then that that that and and people are able to look at look at you know grok at xai and compare that and say wait a second why are all these other ais uh being basically sexist and racist um um and uh then then that
that causes some embarrassment for the the other ais and then they they they they affect that you know they they improve they tend to improve just in the same way that um acquiring twitter and allowing the truth to be told and and not suppressing the truth um forced the other social media companies to be more truthful um by in the same way having um grok be a maximally truth-seeking curious ai is will force the other ai companies to um be also be more truth-seeking and fair and the funniest thing is
even though like the socialists and the marxists are in opposition to a lot of your ideas but if this gets implemented and you really can achieve universal high income that's the greatest socialist solution of all time like literally no one will have to work uh correct um but like i said so so there is a
benign scenario here which i think probably people will be happy with if as long as we achieve it which is sustainable abundance um which is if if um if everyone can have every like like like if you ask people like what's the future that you want um and uh i think a future where we haven't destroyed nature like you can still we have the national parks we have the amazon rainforest it's still it's still there we haven't paved we haven't paved the paved the rainforest like the natural beauty is
still there but but people have nonetheless everyone has abundance everyone has excellent medical care everyone has whatever goods and services they want and we just it's kind of sounds like heaven
it sounds like it is like the ideal socialist utopia and this idea that the only thing you should be doing with your time is working in order to pay your bills and feed yourself sounds kind of archaic considering the kind of technology that's at play yeah like a world where that's not your concern at all anymore everybody has money for food everybody has abundance everybody has electronics in their home everybody essentially has a high income now you can kind of do whatever you want and your day can now be
exploring your interests doing things that you actually enjoy doing your purpose just has to shift so instead of you know i'm a hard worker and this is what i do and that's how i that's how i define myself don't now you can fucking golf all day you know you can whatever it is that you enjoy doing can now be your main pursuit yeah well that sounds crazy good yeah that's that's that's that's the
benign scenario that we should be ending to the movie is actually pretty good yes um like i think there's there is still this question of meaning um of like making sure people don't uh lose meaning you know like um so hopefully it can find meaning in ways that are not that's not derived from their
work and purpose purpose for things that you you know find things that you do that you enjoy but there's a lot of people that are independently wealthy that spend most of their time doing something they enjoy right and that could be the majority of people pretty much everyone but we'd have to rewire how people approach life which seems to be like acceptable because you're not asking them to be enslaved you're exactly asking them the opposite like no longer be burdened by financial
worries now go do what you like yes go fucking test pizza do whatever you want um pretty much um
um so that's uh that's that's the that's the that's probably the best case outcome that sounds
like the best case outcome period for the future if you're looking at like how much people have struggled just to feed themselves all throughout history food shelter safety if all that stuff can be fixed like how much would you solve a lot of the crime if there was a universal high income just think of that like how much of crime is financially motivated you know the greater percentage of people that are committing crimes live in poor disenfranchised neighborhoods so if
there's no such thing anymore if you really can achieve universal high income yeah this is it sounds
like a utopian yes um i think some people may commit crime because they like committing crime just some some amount of that as they just there's a lot of wild people out there yeah yeah um and obviously
they've become 40 years old living a life like that now all of a sudden universal high income is not
going to completely stop their instincts yeah um i mean i guess if you want to have like like say read a science fiction book or some books that that are probably inaccurate or or the least inaccurate version of the future i'd say i'd i'd recommend um the ian banks books called the the culture books it's not actually a series it's a it's like a sci-fi books about the future they're generally called the culture books ian banks culture books it's worth reading those when did he write these he started writing them in the 70s um and i think he um the last one i think he was i think it was written just like
around i don't know maybe 2010 or something i'm not sure exactly yeah yeah scottish author ian banks yeah from 87 to 2012 yeah interesting but he but like he wrote the the like his first book considerably was you think he started writing that in the 70s and these books are incredible by the way oh incredible books 4.6 stars on amazon interesting so um well this gives me hope uh yeah this is the
first time i've ever thought about it this way yeah well i mean if it like i'll often ask people what is the future that you want and they have to think about it for a second because you know they were usually tied up in whatever the daily struggles are but but you say what is the future that you want
um and um and generally sustainable abundance or at least say what about a future where there's sustainable abundance like oh yeah that's a pretty good future um so um you know if if and and and that that future is attainable with uh ai and robotics um but but you know it's it's like i said there's not every path is a good path uh there's this it's but i think if we if we push it in the direction of
um maximally truth-seeking and curious then i think ai will want to take to to take care of humanity and foster uh foster humanity um because we're interesting um and if it hasn't been programmed to think that like all straight white males should die which gem and i was basically programmed to do at least first um you know they seem to have fixed that hopefully fixed it but don't you think
culturally like oh we're getting away from that mindset and that people yeah i think we're getting
away from it how preposterous that all is we are getting away from it um so uh we are getting at least it knows the ai mostly knows to hide things but like like i said there is that i think i still have that as or i had that as my like pinned post on x which was like uh hey wait a second guys we still have uh every ai except grok uh is saying that uh basically straight white males should die um and this is a problem and we should fix it um you know but simply me saying that is like tends to generally
result in um you know them like oh that is kind of bad uh maybe we should just we should not have all straight white males die um i think they'll say also all straight asian males should also die as well they'd like they don't like uh like generally that generally the ai and the media which which back in the day the and the the the media was um you know racist against uh uh black
people and sexist against women back in the day now now it is racist against uh white people and nations and and sexist against men um so are they just like being racist and sexist i think they just want to change the target um so uh but but really they just shouldn't be uh racist and sexist at all um you know yeah ideally that would be nice that would be nice um and it's kind of crazy that
we were kind of moving in that general direction until around 2012 and then everything ramped up online and and everybody was accused of being a nazi and everybody was transphobic and racist and sexist and homophobic and everything got exaggerated to the point where it was this wild witch hunt
where everyone was a colombo looking for racism yeah yeah yeah totally um well but but but they they were openly anti-white and often openly anti-asian and then this new sentiment that you cannot be
racist against white people because racism is power and influence okay no it's not yeah racism is is
racism in the absolute um so um you know and there just needs to be consistency so if it's okay to have uh let's say uh black or asian or indian or a pride it should be okay to have white pride too yeah um so that's just a that's just a consistency question um so uh you know um if it's okay to be proud of one religion it should be okay to be proud of i i guess all religions provided they're
that they're they're not like uh oppressive yeah or or don't like as long as part of that religion is not like exterminating uh people who are not in that religion right um so uh it's really just like a consistency bias um or just like uh ensuring consistency to eliminate uh bias um so if it is possible to be uh racist against uh one race it is possible to be racist against any race um so
of course logically yes yeah and arguing against that is that's when you know you're captured it's a
logical inconsistency that makes ai's go insane and people and people go insane yes oh but like the the like you can't simultaneously say um that uh that there's the systemic uh racist oppression but also that races don't exist that that race rate race is a social construct like which is it you you know um you also can't say that um you know anyone who steps foot in america is is automatically
an american except for the people that originally came here exactly exactly except for the colonizers yeah except for the evil colonizers who came here right so which one is it like right if you if as soon as you step foot in a place you are that you are just as american as everyone else then um that would have applied if you apply that consistently then the original white settlers were also just as american
as everyone else yeah logically logically um one more thing that i have to talk to you about before you leave is the rescuing of the people from the space station which uh we talked about you were planning it the last time you were here um the fact that the lack of coverage that that got in mainstream media was one of the most shocking things yeah they're totally memory hold that thing wild yes it's like it's like it didn't exist those people would be dead they'd be stuck up there
well they'd they'd probably still be alive but they're they're they're they're having bone density issues uh because of prolonged exposure to zero gravity well they were already up there for like eight months
right yeah which is an insanely long time it takes forever to recover just from that
yeah they're only supposed to be at the space station for three to six months maximum so one of
the things you told me that was so crazy was that you could have gotten them sooner but yeah but for
political reasons uh they didn't they did not want uh spacex or me to be associated with um returning
the astronauts before the election that is so wild that that's a fact first of all that even we absolutely could have done it um so but even though you did do it and you did it after the election
it received almost no media coverage anyway yes because nothing good can the the the media which is essentially uh a far-left profit the legacy mainstream media is a far-left propaganda machine um and so anything any story that is positive about someone who is not uh part of the sort of far-left tribe will not uh get any coverage so i could save a busload of orphans and and it wouldn't get a single
news story yeah it's it really is nuts it was nuts to watch because even though it was discussed on podcasts and it was discussed on x and it was discussed on social media it's still it was a blip in the news cycle it was very quick it was in and out and because it was a successful launch and you did rescue those people nobody got hurt and there was nothing really there was no blood to talk about right just fucking in and out yeah yeah absolutely well and and as you saw firsthand with
the starship uh launch like starship is um you know by you know at least by some some would consider it to be like the most amazing uh you know engineering project that's happening on earth right now outside of like you know maybe ai or ai and robotics but but certainly in terms of a spectacle to see it is uh the most spectacular thing that is happening on earth right now uh is the starship launch program which anyone can go and see if they just go to south texas and just they can just rent a hotel room
low cost in south padre island or in brownsville and you can see the launch and you can drive right right right past the factory because it's on a public highway um but it gets no coverage
or what coverage it does get was like a rocket blew up so coverage right yeah oh he's a fuck with the rocket blew up like the the the starship program is vastly vastly more capable than the entire apollo moon program vastly more capable this is a spaceship that is designed to make life multi-planetary to carry uh millions of people across the heavens to another planet the the apollo program could
could only send astronauts to the moon for a few hours at a time like they could send two out the entire apollo program could only send astronauts to visit the moon very briefly and then for a few hours and then depart the starship program could create an entire uh lunar base with a million people
you know the magnitudes are different very different magnitudes here so what was the political
resistance basically no no coverage of it yeah but what i wanted to ask you is like what so what were the conversations leading up to the rescue like when you were like i can get them out way quicker
yeah um um well i mean you know i raised this a few times but it was the i was told instructions came from the white house that uh you know that the that there should be no attempt to rescue before
the election that should be illegal um that that really should be a horrendous miscarriage of justice
for those poor people that were stuck on that um yeah it is it is crazy um have you ever talked to
those folks afterwards did you have conversations with them yeah i mean they're they're not going to
say anything political to you know they're not like they're never going to say thank you yeah yeah
well that's nice yeah absolutely so um but the instructions came down from the white house you cannot rescue them because politically this is a bad hand of cards i mean they didn't say because
politically it's a bad hand of cards but they just said uh they weren't they were not interested in uh any rescue operation before the election yeah so what did that feel like i wasn't surprised
but it's crazy yeah because biden could have authorized it and they could have said the biden administration is helping bring those people back throw you a little funding give you some money to do it the biden administration they funded these people being returned uh yeah the biden
administration was not exactly my best friend especially after i um you know you know helped trump get elected get elected which i mean some people still think you know trump is like the the devil basically um and i mean i think i think trump actually he's not perfect but but uh he's not evil trump is not evil i mean i spent a lot of time with with him and he's i mean he's a product of his
time uh but he is not he's not evil um no i don't think he's evil either but if you look at the media coverage the media the media treats him like he's super evil yeah it's pretty shocking if you look at the
amount of negative coverage like one of the things that i looked at the other day was mainstream media coverage of you trump a bunch of different public figures and then it's like 96 negative or something
crazy and then mom donnie which is like 95 positive right um i mean mom donnie is is is a charismatic swindler um i i've i mean you gotta hand it to him like he he did he can light up a stage um but he has just been a swindler his entire life um and um you know and and uh i think he what he's i mean
he's likely to win like he's likely to be mayor of new york new york city very likely yeah very likely
i think what polymarket has it at what what is the knife yeah that sounds pretty likely that's crazy
like i'm not sure who the six percent are you um so so so yeah so that's um it's also like
who's on the other side the fucking guardian angel guy with the beret and Andrew Cuomo who doesn't even have a party like the democrats don't even want him so you have those two options
um and then you have the young kids who are like finally socialism
yeah they they don't know what they're talking about obviously um so you know like you just look at this say how many boats come from cuba to florida and how many but and how many boats because you know there's like a constant i always think like how many boats are accumulating on the shores of florida coming from from cuba right um there's a whole bunch of free boats that you could if you want to go take them back to cuba it's pretty close yeah but for some reason people don't do that
why why why why are the boats only coming in this direction
um well who is who are the most rabid capitalists in america the fucking cubans absolutely yeah they're like we've seen how this story goes we do not want exactly fuck off
they don't want to hear any bullshit they don't want to hear any socialism bullshit they're like no no no we know what this actually is this isn't just some fucking dream yeah it's extreme government
oppression um that's what it was it's a nightmare and like the like an obvious way you can tell which uh which ideology is is the bad one is um who has to which ideology is building a wall to keep people in and prevent them from escaping right like so east berlin built the built the wall not west berlin right they built the wall because people were trying to escape from communism to west
berlin but there wasn't anyone going from west berlin to east berlin right that's why the communists had to build a wall to keep people from escaping they're gonna have to build a wall around new york city
yeah that's so so when you say this guy it's kind of an obvious tell that ideology is problematic if that ideology has to build a wall to keep people in with machine guns yes and shoot you if you try to
leave also there's no examples of it being successful ever we're working out for people no there's examples of a bunch of lies like north korea give this land to the state we'll be in control of food no one goes hungry no now no one can grow food but the government and we'll tell you exactly what you eat and you eat very little right yeah what when you say mom donnie's a swindler i know he has a bunch of fake accents that he used to use yeah and you know but what else has he done that makes
him a swindler um well i i guess if you say uh what i mean if you say if you say to any audience whatever that audience wants to hear uh instead of what instead of having a consistent message i would say that that is a swindlery thing to do um and uh yeah um yeah but but he is he is charismatic um
yeah good-looking guy smart charismatic yeah great on a microphone yeah yeah yeah and what the young people want to see you know like this ethnic guy who's young and vibrant and has all these socialist ideas aligns with them and you know they're a bunch of broke dorks just out of college like yay let's vote for this and there's a lot of them and they're they're activated they're motivated um i guess we'll
we'll we'll see we'll see what happens here what do you think happens if he wins um because like one percent of new york city is responsible for fifty percent of their tax base which is kind of nuts fifty percent of the tax revenue comes from one percent of the population and those are the people
that you're scaring off you know you lose one half of one percent i mean hopefully this this the stuff he's he said uh you know about uh government takeovers of of of like that all the stores should be the government basically um well i don't think he said that i think he said government they want to do
government supermarkets some state-run or city-run supermarkets yeah um well it just the the government
is the dmv at scale so um you have to say like do you want the dmv running your supermarket right um was your last experience at the dmv amazing uh and if it wasn't you probably don't want the government
doing things imagine if they were responsible for getting you blueberries yeah it's not going to be
good i mean the the thing about you know communism is is it was it was all bread lines and bad shoes um you know if do you want ugly shoes and bread lines because that's what communism gets you it's
going to be interesting to see what happens and whether or not they snap out of it and over correct and go to some rudy giuliani type character next because it's been a long time since there was any
sort of republican leader there we live we live in the in the most interesting of times um because we face the you know simultaneously face civilizational decline um and incredible prosperity
um and these these timelines are interwoven um so um if mamdani's policies are put into place especially at scale um it it would be a catastrophic uh decline in living standards not just for the rich but for everyone um uh as as has been the case with with every um every for every socialist experiment um or ever again yeah so um but but then as you pointed out the the irony is that like um the ultimate
capitalist thing of ai and robotics uh enabling uh prosperity for all and abundance of goods and services actually the capitalist uh implementation of ai and robotics assuming it goes down the the good path uh is is actually what results in the communist utopia because fate is fate is an irony
maximizer right and and an actual socialism of maximum abundance of high income people universal high
high income yeah like the the problem with communism uh is is it's universal low income um it's it's not that everyone gets elevated it's that everyone gets oppressed except for a very small minority of of politicians who live a life of luxury that's what's happening every time it's been done yeah um so um um but then the the the actual communist utopia if everyone gets anything they want will be will be
if if will be achieved if it is achieved it will be achieved via capitalism because fate is an irony maximizer i feel like we should probably end it on that is anything else the most ironic outcome is the
most likely especially if entertaining well everything has been entertaining as long as the bad things aren't happening to you it's quite fascinating and it's never a boring moment yes so there's i do have a
theory of why um like if if if simulation theory is true then um it is actually very likely that uh the most interesting outcome is the is the most likely because only the simulations that are interesting will continue the simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're they're not interesting
but here's the question about the simulation theory is the simulation run by anyone or is it would be run by someone
it would be run by some some some force the pro the program like in in this reality that we live in we we run simulations all the time like so when we try to figure out if the rocket's uh going to make it we run um thousands sometimes millions of simulations just to figure out which which uh path is the good path for the rocket and and where can it go wrong where can it fail um but we when we do these i said at this point millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket um we ignore the ones
that are where everything goes right um because we we just care about we have we have to address the situations where it goes wrong um so um so so basically in in in and and for for ai simulations as well like like all these things we we keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us um so if simulation theory is accurate if if it is true who knows um then the uh the the the simulators
will only can they will continue to run the simulations that are most interesting therefore from a darwinian perspective um the only surviving simulations will be the interest the most interesting ones and in order to um avoid getting turned off uh the only rule is you must keep it interesting or you will if or you will because the boring simulations will be terminated are you still
completely convinced that this is a simulation i didn't say i was completely convinced well you said it's like the odds of it not being or in the billions like i said it's not completely because
you're saying there's a chance what are the odds that we're in base reality um well given that given that that we're able to create increasingly sophisticated simulations so if you think of say video games and how video games have gone from very simple video games like pong with you know two rectangles in a square to video games today being um photorealistic uh with millions of people playing simultaneously and all of that has occurred in our lifetime
so if that trend continues uh video games will be indistinguishable from reality the fidelity of the game will be such that you you don't know if that what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video um and like ai generated videos at this point like you can sometimes tell it's an ai generated video but often you cannot tell and soon you will not really just not be able to tell so um if if that's happening in our direct observation then and and we're we'll create
millions if not billions of photorealistic simulations of reality then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation well isn't it just possible that the
simulation is inevitable but that we are in base reality building towards a simulation we're making
simulations um so um we're making simulations we make like you can just think of like photorealistic video games as being simulations um and especially as you apply ai in these video games like the characters in the video games will be incredibly interesting to talk to they won't just have a limited dialogue tree where if you go to like the the crossbow merchant or like and you try to talk about any subject except buying a crossbow they just want to talk about selling you a crossbow
um but with with ai based non-player characters you can you'll be able to have an elaborate
conversation with no dialogue tree well that might be the solution for meaning for people just walk in and you could be a fucking vampire and whatever you live in avatar land you could do it you could do whatever you want i mean you don't have to think about money or food ready player one yeah literally yeah but with higher living standards yeah you don't have to be a little
trailer i mean i i think this people do want to have some amount of struggle or something they want to push against um but but it could be you know playing a sports or playing a game it could be
easily playing a game yeah and especially playing a game where you're now no longer worried about like physical attributes like athletics like bad joints and hips and stuff like that now it's completely digital but yet you do have meaning in pursuing this thing that you're doing all day
whatever the fuck that means it's going to be weird it's going to be interesting it's going to be very
interesting um the most the most interesting and and usually ironic outcome is the most likely
all right that's a good predictor of the future thank you thanks for being here really appreciate it good to see you appreciate your time i know you're a busy man so this means a lot
thank you bye everybody
Upload your interview recording and get professional transcription with AI-generated insights.
Upload Your Interview